C-2.
2014
Info for
questions 1-2: We want to examine whether animal assisted therapy can help
children with cerebral palsy (pet therapy vs therapy
without animals), and whether this effect is modulated by gender. We recruited
40 children with cerebral palsy (20 boys and 20 girls), from Valencia and
Alicante. At random, 20 individuals (with the logic restriction: 10 boys and 10
girls) received animal assisted therapy for 10 weeks, and the other 20
individuals received similar therapy but without animals (using toys) for 10
weeks. We measured the level of irritability (on a scale of 1 to 7) of children
after treatment.
Question 1:
a) Which
are the independent and dependent variables?
b) Is this
an experiment or a quasi-experiment? Explain your answer
Question 2:
a) If we
want to organize the data to compute statistics with, say, SPSS, how many rows
and columns are necessary? (and why)
b) Do you
think it would be advisable to measure the degree of irritability of the children
at some other time? Explain your answer.
Info for
Questions 3-4: We have data from 40 high-school students in three subtests of Language.
We also have gender, whether they go to public or private school, a measure of
executive function (i.e., attention; more score, the better executive function),
time spent watching TV per day (in minutes), and if whether they have 3G/4G in
their cell phones. The file is in http://www.uv.es/mperea/atencion.sav
Question 3.
Are there
any differences in executive function depending of whether they have (or not)
3G / 4G? Look at the box and whisker diagram. Justify briefly your the
conclusions. (Copy / paste the SPSS output as well.)
Question 4.
First off,
select only students of private/concerted schools. Indicate a graph for variable
"gender". Copy / paste this graph and indicate the conclusions (i.e.,
are there more boys than girls or vice versa?).
C-1.
2014
Statement
for questions 1-2: We want to examine whether animal assisted therapy (with
animals vs. with toys) can help children with autism spectrum. We recruited 30
children with autism from Valencia and Alicante. The Valencia participants
received a horse-assisted therapy for 10 weeks, and the Alicante participants received
a similar therapy but without animals (using toys in place) for 10 weeks. We
measured the level of irritability (on a scale of 1 to 7) and the level of socailibty (on a scale from 1 to 7) of children after
treatment.
Question 1:
a) Which
are the independent and dependent variables?
b) If we
want to organize the data to compute statistics with, say, SPSS, how many rows
and columns are necessary? (and why)
Question 2:
a) Is an
experiment or a quasi-experiment? Explain your answer
b) Would it
have been desirable to obtain the degree of irritability (and sociability) of
children before starting treatment? Justify your answer
Info for
Questions 3-4: We have data from 40 high-school students in three subtests of Language.
We also have gender, whether they go to public or private school, a measure of
executive function (i.e., attention; more score, the better executive function),
time spent watching TV per day (in minutes), and if whether they have 3G/4G in
their cell phones. The file is in http://www.uv.es/mperea/atencion.sav
Question 3.
Create the
variable "average_grades" in SPSS,
averaging the 3 exams of Language. Do you see differences between the level of language depending on the school type? Have a look
at the box and whiskers diagram and indicate the appropriate statistical indexes
(central tendency and variability, in particular). Discuss the findings in one
or two sentences. (Copy / paste the data from SPSS.)
Question 4.
We want to
have the score of "executive function" (remember, the more score, the
better executive function) that leaves below approximately 10% of cases, since
children with lower scores may suffer attentional problems in class. What is
the value? (Copy / paste the data in the file.)
B-1 2014
Statement
for questions 1 and 2: We want to examine whether the taste of the paella
(frozen paella) differs on a plane in the air or at the airport, and whether this
effect is modulated by the fact of the participants being or not professional
chefs. We recruited 60 people (30 professional chefs, 30 non-experts).
Randomly, 30 participants (half of them cooks) ate the paella on a plane at a
local airport, while the other half of participants ate the paella on a flight
from Valencia to Lisbon. The silverware, dishes, etc had
always the same characteristics. All participants, after eating the paella had
to evaluate the intensity of flavor of paella (scale from 1 to 10) and the perceived
quality of the paella (scale from 1 to 10)
Question 1:
a) Which
are the independent and dependent variables?
b) Is this
an experiment or a quasi-experiment? Explain your answer
Question 2:
a) If we
want to organize the data to compute statistics with, say, SPSS, how many rows
and columns are necessary? (and why)
b) Has
there been any independent variables manipulated "within-subjects" (ie, all subjects go through all levels of the independent
variable)? And if "no", how we could have done any within-subject
manipulation? Describe the manipulation briefly.
Info for
Questions 3-4: We have data from 40 high-school students in three subtests of Language.
We also have gender, whether they go to public or private school, a measure of
executive function (i.e., attention; more score, the better executive function),
time spent watching TV per day (in minutes), and if whether they have 3G/4G in
their cell phones. The file is in http://www.uv.es/mperea/atencion.sav
Question 3.
LetŐs
dichotomize the variable "time watching TV per day" using two levels:
1 = up to 50 minutes inclusive (label: "low"), and 2 = 51 or more
minutes (label: "high"). The name of this new variable can be "time_TV_groups". Are there differences in executive
function depending on watching TV? Look at the box and whisker diagram and
indicate the conclusions in one or two sentences. (Copy / paste the output of
SPSS.)
Question 4.
Indicate
the result of four measures of central tendency for the variable
"executive function". Copy / Paste the output of SPSS.
B-2,
2014
Statement
for questions 1 and 2: We want to examine whether the size of a dessert dish
influences the feeling of being satiated in people with bulimia (i.e., an
eating disorder). We recruited 20 people with bulimia. There were two sessions.
All participants had to eat a similar dessert, with the difference that in a session
the dish was served in a large plate, and in the other session another day the
dish was served in a small plate. The order small-large vs. large-small was
counterbalanced at random, half of the participants went from small to large,
and the other went from large to small). After eating the dessert, in each of
the two sessions, participants had to indicate the degree of satiation on a 1-10
scale.
Question 1:
a) Which
are the independent and dependent variables?
b) Is this
an experiment or a quasi-experiment? Explain your answer
Question 2:
a) If we
want to organize the data to compute statistics with, say, SPSS, how many rows
and columns are necessary? (and why)
b) LetŐs
assume the that data showed that the feeling of being satiated was
substantially higher when the plate was small than when the plate was big
Indicates a potential next step in the investigation. (Possible clue: Any other groups to be included?)
Info for
Questions 3-4: We have data from 40 high-school students in three subtests of Language.
We also have gender, whether they go to public or private school, a measure of
executive function (i.e., attention; more score, the better executive function),
time spent watching TV per day (in minutes), and if whether they have 3G/4G in
their cell phones. The file is in http://www.uv.es/mperea/atencion.sav
Question 3.
LetŐs
dichotomize the variable "executive function" in two levels: 1 = up
to 5 (label: "low"), and 2 = 6 or more (label: "high"). The
name of this new variable can be "attention_groups".
Are there differences in the grade of ŇhistoriaÓ
(history) depending on executive function? Look at the box and whisker diagram
and indicate the conclusions in one or two sentences. (Copy / paste the output
of SPSS.)
Question 4.
LetŐs
assume that that the language teacher made a mistake when correcting the
responses in each of the three exams, and that in fact, every student should
have an extra 0.5 points. Indicate the correct grade (Ňgrade_language_okÓ)
for the average of the three exams. And now the question: which data point in Ňgrade_language_okÓ leaves below it approximately 50% of the
cases? (Copy / Paste from SPSS).