Practice
1. Statistics. (November
2015)
A researcher wants
to examine whether the response times in an experiment are faster in the presence
of another person during an experiment. The experiment consists of two blocks. 40
students took part in the experiment. In the first block, the participant
performed a cognitive task alone—the experimenter measured the overall time in
this initial block. In the second block, the participant performed a similar
cognitive task with the difference that there was another person in the room
(this other person, the "confederate" was actually brought by the
investigator), and again, the experiment measured the overall time in the block
Question 1:
a) Which are the
independent and dependent variables?
b) If we want to
organize the data to compute statistics with, say, SPSS, how many rows and columns are necessary? (and why)
Question 2:
a) Is this an
experiment or a correlational study? Explain your answer
b) Let’s assume that
participants were faster in the presence of "confederate" than alone,
and that the researcher concluded that the response times in cognitive tasks
(or at least the cognitive task used in the study) are faster in the presence
of another person. This has an obvious shortcoming: It could be argued that
people are faster in the second block not necessarily by the presence of the
other person (the "Confederate") but simply because they have more
practice on the task. How would you modify the study to examine properly
whether the presence of another person affects the participants’ response
times?
Question
3:
We
have a database with demographic variables and with variables related to
well-being, optimism, pessimism, among others. It is available at the following
link http://www.uv.es/mperea/bienestar.sav
Are
there differences between men and women in the variable "well-being"?
Create firstly the variable "well_being" by
adding the 4 questions—before doing that, pay attention to the fact that the
third item was reversed. (Each item goes from 1 to 6.) Just examine the box and
whisker diagram, with the focus on central tendency and variability, in
particular.
Question 4.
Indicate
which one is the most common (i.e., most repeated) for the women in the sample.
Practice
2. Statistics (November 2015)
A researcher wants
to examine whether the amount of tip given to waiters in a restaurant is
influenced by the gender of the waiter (male, female) and by the fact of adding
getting the check. There were 60 tables in the restaurant. Among these 60
tables, the first 30 tables in the evening (i.e., the customers who arrived
somewhat early) will be given the check with candies (in half the cases, it
was a waiter, and the other half it was a waitress), and the remaining 30 tables
receive the check without the candy (in half the cases, it was a waiter, and
the other half it was a waitress). The researcher measured the tip in each of
the 60 tables.
Question 1:
a) Which are the
independent and dependent variables?
b) If we want to
organize the data to compute statistics with, say, SPSS, how many rows and
columns are necessary? (and why)
Question 2:
a) Is this an
experiment or a quasi-experiment? Explain your answer
b) How would you
modify the study to reach more definitive conclusions? (e.g., can you improve
the way the experiment was designed? How?)
Question
3:
We
have a database with demographic variables and with variables related to
well-being, optimism, pessimism, among others. It is available at the following
link http://www.uv.es/mperea/bienestar.sav
Are
there differences in the variable Well-Being depending on “situación
personal” (personal situation) (single, married…). Create firstly the variable
"well_being" by adding the 4
questions—before doing that, pay attention to the fact that the third item was
reversed. (Each item goes from 1 to 6.) Just examine the box and whisker
diagram, with the focus on central tendency and variability, in particular.
Question 4.
Which
graph would you use for the variable “pessimism” for those individuals born in
Spain in the sample. Why? Copy and paste from SPSS.
Practice
3. Statistics (November 2015)
A researcher wants to examine the effectiveness
of a new therapy for treating agoraphobia (ie the
phobia of open spaces) relatie to the standard
therapy and whether its effectiveness differs between severe and mild cases.
The simple was composed of 40 individuals diagnosed with agoraphobia (half
"mild", half "severe"). Assignment to each therapy was at
random, while keeping constant the ratio of mild vs severe cases (i.e., 10
mild, 10 severe in each treatment). Each session lasted 3 hours in each treatments, with a total of 10 sessions. The researcher
measured the agoraphobia level just after the treatment, and also two months
after treatment.
Question 1:
a) Which are the independent and dependent
variables?
b) If we want to organize the data to compute
statistics with, say, SPSS, how many rows and columns are necessary? (and why)
Question 2:
a) Is this an experiment or a quasi-experiment?
Explain your answer
b) Would it have been desirable to have
manipulated the psychological treatment in a within-subject design?
Question 3:
We
have a database with demographic variables and with variables related to
well-being, optimism, pessimism, among others. It is available at the following
link http://www.uv.es/mperea/bienestar.sav
Let’s suppose that when creating
the database, the score of prosperity for each person was be a point lower than
it should be. Please fix it and create the variable "prosperity_ok".
Once this is done, are there differences between men and women in the variable
"prosperity_ok"? Just look at the box and
whisker diagram (on the central tendency and variability, in particular)
Question 4.
In the case of those individuals
born in Spain, please indicate a graph for the variable "gender" and
discuss it briefly.
Practice
4. Statistics (November 2015)
A researcher wants to examine the effects of
negative feedback (information on how the task was done but only in cases of
error) in children and adults. The sample was composed of 20 children and 20
adults. Half of them, chosen at random (10 children, 10 adults) completed a
series of trials without any feedback. The other half received negative
feedback (ie, an ERROR after an error). The
researcher measured the overall time to complete the tasks and also the
subjective mood (after the task.
Question 1:
a) Which are the independent and dependent
variables?
b) If we want to organize the data to compute
statistics with, say, SPSS, how many rows and columns are necessary? (and why)
Question 2:
a) Is this an experiment or a quasi-experiment?
Explain your answer
b) Let’s assume that the subjective mood after
the test was substantially lower in the individuals with negative feedback than
in the “no feedback” group. Logically, this limits the use of negative feedback
as an element to learn. How would you improve the design
of this study?
Question 3.
We
have a database with demographic variables and with variables related to
well-being, optimism, pessimism, among others. It is available at the following
link http://www.uv.es/mperea/bienestar.sav
Which
one is the score of "Pessimism" (more score, more pessimism) leaving
below 85% of the individuals? (keep in mind that these
individuals may need some help)
Question 4.
Exclude
all individuals with 30 or more years (i.e., the idea is to have a sample of
young people). Are there any differences between men and women in the variable
"satisfaction" (satisfaction with life)? Just look at the box and whisker diagram (on the central tendency and
variability, in particular)