Alberti, Giovan Battista 1979. Problemi di critica
testuale. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
*Bald, R. C. 1950-51. “Editorial Problems – A Preliminary
Survey.” Studies in Bibliography 3: 13-17.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib3toc.htm
*Bédier, Joseph 1928 (1970). La tradition manuscrite de
“Lai du l'ombre”: Réflexions sur l'art d'éditer les anciens
textes. Paris: Champion.
Blecua, Alberto 1983. Manual de Crítica Textual. Madrid:
Castalia. [FI.V 0009/0480]
*Bornstein, G. ed. Palimpsest: Editorial Theory in the
Humanities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Bowers, Fredson T. 1949. Principles of Bibliographical
Description. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
*Bowers, Fredson T. 1959. Textual and Literary Criticism.
Cambridge: CUP. (2nd ed. 1966)
*Bowers, Fredson T. 1964. Bibliography and Textual
Criticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bowers, Fredson T. 1966. “Textual Criticism.” The
Reader's Encyclopaedia of Shakespeare. Ed. O. J. Campbell
& E. G. Quinn. New York: Thomas Y Cromwell Company. 864-9.
*Bowers, Fredson T. 1970. “Textual Criticism”. The Aims
and Methods of Scholarship in Modern Languages. Ed. James
Thorpe. New York: MLA. 29-54.
Bowers, Fredson T. 1970b. “Bibliography.” Encyclopaedia
Britannica. 27 vols. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica,
Inc. 3: 588-92.
Bowers, Fredson T. 1991. “Authorial Intention and Editorial
Problems.” TEXT 5: 49-61.
Brack, O and Barnes, W. eds. 1969. Bibliography and
Textual Criticism: English and American Literature, 1700 to
the Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dearing, Vinton 1974. Principles and Practice of Textual
Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Francis, Frank C. 1974. “Bibliography.” Encyclopaedia
Britannica. 24 vols. Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press. 20: 579-582. (15th ed.)
Febvre, Lucien & Martin, Henri-Jean 1990. The Coming
of the Book: The Impact of Printing, 1450-1800. Trans.
David Gerard. London: Verso.
*Gaskell, Philip 1978. From Writer to Reader: Studies in
Editorial Method. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Filolog.
Anglesa]
Gottesman, R. and Bennet, S. eds. 1970. Art and Error:
Modern Textual Editing. Bloomington: Indiana University
Press.
*Greetham, D. C. 1991. “Textual Scholarship.” Introduction
to Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literatures. Ed. J.
Gibaldi. New York: Modern Language Association. 103-137.
*Greetham, D. C. 1992. Textual Scholarship. An
Introduction. Garland Reference Library of the Humanities
vol. 1417. New York & London: Garland Publishing, Inc.
[152/225]
*Greetham, D. C. 1995. Scholarly Editing: A Guide to
Research. New York: MLA.
Greg, W.W. 1928. Principles of Emendation. British
Academy Lecture. Oxford: OUP.
*Greg, W.W. 1950. “The Rationale of the Copy-text.” Studies
in Bibliography 3: 19-36.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib3toc.htm
Housman, A. C. 1921. “The Application of Thought to Textual
Criticism.” Proceedings of the Classical Association 18:
67-84. [150/427]
Maas, Paul 1927 (1958). Textual Criticism. Trans.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pasquali, Giorgio 1934. Storia de la tradizione e critica
del testo. Firenze: (1952)
Quentin, Dom Henry 1926. Essais de critique textuelle
(Ecdotique). Paris: Picard. [Filolog. Anglesa]
Reynolds, Leighton D. and Wilson, N. G. 1986. Copistas y
filólogos : las vías de transmisión de las literaturas griega
y latina. Madrid: Gredos. [L 0001/544]
Ruiz, Elisa 1985. “Crítica Textual, Edición de Textos.” Métodos
de Estudio de la Obra Literaria. Ed. J. M. Díez Borque.
Madrid: Taurus. 67-120. [102/150]
Salvatore, A. 1983. Edizione critica e critica del testo.
Roma: Jouvence.
Tanselle, G. Thomas, ed. 1979. Selected Studies in
Bibliography. Charlottesville: University Press of
Virginia.
Tanselle, G. 1980. “Recent Editorial Discussion and the
Central Questions of Editing.” Studies in Bibliography
34: 23-65.
Tanselle, G. Thomas 1981. “Textual Scholarship.” Introduction
to Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literatures. Ed. J.
Gibaldi. New York: Modern Language Association. 29-52.
*Tanselle, G. Thomas 1989. A Rationale of Textual
Criticism. Philadelphia: University Press of Pennsylvania.
[152/117]
Tanselle, G. Thomas 1994. “Editing without a Copy-Text.” Studies
in Bibliography XLVII: 1-22.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib47toc.htm
*Tanselle, G. Thomas 1995. “The Varieties of Scholarly
Editing.” Scholarly Editing: A Guide to Research.
Ed. D. C. Greetham. New York: MLA. 9-32.
Taylor, Gary 1988. “The Rhetoric of Textual Criticism.” TEXT
4: 39-57.
Thorpe, James 1972. Principles of Textual Criticism.
San Marino: Huntington Library.
Vinaver, E. 1939. “Principles of Textual Emendation.” Studies
in French Language and Medieval Literature Presented to
Professor Mildred K. Pope. Manchester: Manchester
University Press. 351-69.Rpt. Christopher Kleinhenz, ed. Medieval
Manuscripts and textual Criticism. Chapel Hill, North
Carolina, 1976. 139-59.
West, Martin L. 1973. Textual Criticism and Editorial
Technique. Stuttgart: Teubner.
Williams, W. P. and Craig, S.A. 1989. An Introduction to
Bibliographical and Textual Studies. 2nd ed. New York:
MLA. [152/226]
B.- Objeciones críticas desde 1960 y nuevas direcciones
*Gabler, Hans Walter 1981. “The Synchrony and Diachrony of
Texts: Practice and Theory of the Critical Edition of James
Joyce's Ulysses.” TEXT 1: 305-26.
Gabler, Hans Walter 1987. “The Text as Process and the
Problem of Intentionality.” TEXT 3: 107-116.
Gabler, Hans Walter, Steppe, W. & Melchior, Claus, ed.
1984. Ulysses: A Critical and Synoptic Edition. New York:
Garland. [Filolog. Anglesa]
Gaskell, Philip 1972. A New Introduction to Bibliography. New
York and Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hancher, Michael. 1972. "Three Kinds of Intention," Modern
Language Notes 87 :
827-851.
*Hay, Louis 1987. “Genetic Editing, Past and Present.” Text
3: 117-34.
Hay, Louis 1988. “Does Text Exist?” Studies in Bibliography
41: 75-76.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib41toc.htm
Howard-Hill, Trevor. H. 1988. “Playwrights’ Intentions and
the Editing of Plays.” TEXT 4: 269-78.
Howard-Hill, Trevor H. 1989. “Modern Textual Theories and the
Editing of Plays.” Library Sixth Series, 11: 89-115.
*Martens, Gunter & Zeller, Hans, ed. 1971. Texte und
Varianten. Probleme ihrer Edition und Interpretation. München:
C. H. Beck. [Filolog. Anglesa]
Martens, Gunter 1982. “Texte ohne Varianten?” Zeitschrift für
Deutsche Philologie 101: 43-64.
*McGann, Jerome 1983. A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [152/240]
McGann, Jerome 1985. Textual Criticism and Literary
Interpretation. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
180-199. [152/227]
McGann, Jerome 1991. “What is Critical Editing?” TEXT 5:
22-29.
McKenzie, Donald F. 1969. “Printers of the Mind: Some Notes
on Bibliographical Theories and Printing-House Practices.”
Studies in Bibliography 22: 1-76.
*McKenzie, Donald F. 1986. Bibliography and the Sociology of
Texts. The British Library. [Paleografia]
McLaverty, James. 1984. "The Mode of Existence of Literary
Works of Art: The Case
of the Dunciad
Variorum." Studies in Bibliography 37: 82-105.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib37toc.htm
McLeod, Randall, ed. 1994. Crisis in editing : texts of the
English Renaissance : papers given at the twenty-fourth Annual
Conference on Editorial Problems, University of Toronto, 4-5
November 1988. New York : AMS Press.
Oliphant, Dave & Bradford, Robin, ed. 1990. New
Directions in Textual Studies. Austin: Harry Ransom Humanities
Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin.
*Parker, Hershel 1984. Flawed Texts and Verbal Icons:
Literary Authority in American Fiction. Evanston: Northwestern
University Press.
Pearsall, Derek 1985. “Editing Medieval Texts.” Textual
Criticism and Literary Interpretation. Ed. J. McGann. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press. 92-106.
Pizer, Donald 1971. “On the Editing of Modern American
Texts.” Bulletin of the New York Public Library 75: 147-53.
Reiman, Donald H. 1987. Romantic Texts and Contexts.
Columbia: University of Missouri Press. [151/295]
Sattler, D. E. 1978. Friedrich Hölderlin Sämtliche Werke
“Franfurter Ausgabe”. Vol. 2 Lieder und Hymnen. Franfurt am
Main: Verlag Roter Stern.
Shillingsburg, Peter L. 1989. “An Inquiry Into the Social
Status of Texts and Modes of Textual Criticism.” Studies in
Bibliography XLII: 55-79.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib42toc.htm
Small, Ian & Walsh, Marcus, ed. 1992. The theory and
Practice of Text-Editing: Essays in Honour of James T. Boulton.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 232.
Tanselle, G. Thomas. 1976. "The Editorial Problem of Final
Authorial Intention." Studies in Bibliography 29: 167-211.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib29toc.htm
Tanselle, G. Thomas. "Recent Editorial Discussion and the
Central Questions of Editing." Studies in Bibliography 34:
23-65. http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib34toc.htm
Wordsworth, J. et alii eds. 1979.Wordsworth: The Prelude:
1789, 1805, 1850. New York: Norton & Company.
[152/203]
*Zeller, Hans 1975. “A New Approach to the Critical
Constitution of Literary Texts.” Studies in Bibliography 28:
231-63. http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib28toc.htm
B.2 Edición digital. Edición en la era virtual.
Best, Michael. 1998. The Internet Shakespeare:
Opportunities in a New Medium. Early Modern Literary Studies.
Special issue 2.
Clark, Robert. 2000. “Literacy, the Book and the Internet:
Retrospect and Prospects.” The European English Messenger IX/2:
57-61.
Delaney, Paul and George Landow, eds. 1991. Hypertext,
Hypermedia and Literary Studies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Donaldson, Peter S. 1997. “Digital Archive as Expanded Text:
Shakespeare and Electronic Textuality.” Electronic Text:
Investigations in Method and Theory. Ed. Kathryn Sutherland.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Foster, Donald W. 1998. “A Romance of Electronic Scholarship;
with the True and Lamentable Tragedies of Hamlet, Prince of
Denmark. Part 1: The Words.” Early Modern Literary Studies 3.3 /
Special issue 2 (January): 5.1-42
<http://purl.oclc.org/emls/03-3/fostshak.html>
Hockey, Susan. 2000. Electronic Texts in the Humanities.
Principles and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kirschenbaum, Matthew. 2002. “Editing the Interface: Textual
Studies and First Generation Electronic Objects.” TEXT 14:
15-32.
Landow, George. 1992. Hypertext: The Convergence of
Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Baltimore and
London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Landow, George. 1997. Teoría del Hipertexto. Barcelona:
Paidós.
Landow, George, and Paul Delaney, eds. 1993. The Digital
Word. Text-Based Computing in the Humanities. Cambridge, Mass..
London: MIT.
Laufer, Roger, and Domenico Scavetta. 1992. Texte, hypertext,
hypermédia. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Literary and Linguistic Computing: Journal of the Association
for Literary and Linguistic Computing. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 1986-
Massai, Sonia. "Redefining the Role of the Editor for the
Electronic Medium: A New Internet Shakespeare Edition of Edward
III." Early Modern Literary Studies: A Journal of Sixteenth-
and Seventeenth-Century English Literature 9.3 (2004): 10
paragraphs.
McGann, Jerome. 1995. “The Rationale of Hypertext.” The
European English Messenger IV / 2: 34-40. Also at
<http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/public/jjm2f/rationale.htm>
McGann, Jerome. 2002. “The Gutenberg Variations.” TEXT 14:
1-14.
Research in Humanities Computing. Ed. Susan Hockey and Nancy
Ide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991-
Schreibman, Susan. 1999. “Humanities Computing: Text to
Hypertext.” The European English Messenger VIII/1: 55-7.
Shillingsburg, Peter L. 1986. Scholarly Editing in the
Computer Age. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shillingsburg, Peter L. 1991. “Text as Matter, Concept and
Action.” Studies in Bibliography 44: 31-82.
Shillingsburg, Peter L. 1993. “Polymorphic, Polysemic,
Protean, Reliable, Electronic Texts.” Palimpsest: Editorial
Theory in the Humanities. Ed. G. Bornstein. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan. 29-44.
Siemens, R. G. 2002. “Shakespearean Apparatus? Explicit
Textual Structures and the Implicit Navigation of Accumulated
Knowledge.” TEXT 14: 209-40.
Sutherland, Kathryn, ed. 1997. Electronic Text:
Investigations in Method and Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
van der Weel, Adriaan. 2002. “From Bibliography to Book
Studies.” The European English Messenger XI/2: 34-7.
Werstine, Paul. “Hypertext as Editorial Horizon.” Shakespeare
and the Twentieth Century: The Selected Proceedings of the
International Shakespeare Association World Congress, Los
Angeles, 1996. Ed. J. Bate et al. Newmark: University of
Delaware Press, 1998. 248-57.
Proyectos
Biblioteca Digital Artelope. Ed. gen. Joan Oleza. Universitat
de València. <http://artelope.uv.es/biblioteca/index.php>
Folger Digital Texts. Folger Shakespeare Library.
<http://www.folgerdigitaltexts.org/?chapter=0>
The Electronic Beowulf. Ed. Kevin Kiernan.
<http://www.uky.edu/~Kiernan/eBeowulf&guide.htm>
The Canterbury Tales Project. Ed. Peter Robinson.
<http://www.cta.dmu.ac.uk/projects/ctp/>
The William Blake Archive. Ed. Morris Eaves, Robert N.
Essick, and Joseph Viscomi.
<http://www.iath.virginia.edu/blake>
The Rossetti Archive. Ed. Jerome McGann.
<http://www.iath.virginia.edu/rossetti/>
The Arden Shakespeare CD-ROM: Texts and Sources for
Shakespeare Study. Walton-on-Thames: Arden Shakespeare, 1997.
The Internet Shakespeare Editions. Ed. Michael Best.
<http://web.uvic.ca/shakespeare/>
<http://purl.oclc.org/emls/03-3/03-3toc.html>
Richard Brome Online. Ed. gen. Richard Cave. Royal Holloway,
University of London <http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/brome/>
C.- Problemas textuales y editoriales en Shakespeare
Bevington, David. 2007. "Working with the Text: Editing in
Practice." A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text.
Ed. Andrew Murphy. Oxford: Blackwell. 165-85.
Blake, Norman F. 1990-91. "Modernising Language and Editing
Shakespeare." Poetica: A Journal of Linguistic-Literary
Studies vol. 34: 101-123.
*Bowers, Fredson T. 1955. On Editing Shakespeare and the
Elizabethan Dramatists. Philadelphia: University of
Pennsylvania Press.
Bowers, Fredson T. 1987. “Mixed Texts and Multiple
Authority.” TEXT 3: 63-90.
Brown, John Russell & Spencer, Terence J. B. 1990.
“Shakespeare.” The New Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. 27: 251-270. (15th ed.)
Burkhart, R.E. 1975. Shakespeare's Bad Quartos. The
Hague: Mouton.
Chambers, E.K. 1930. William Shakespeare: a Study of
Facts and Problems. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Erne, Lukas and Margaret J. Kidnie Massai, eds. Textual
Performances. Cambridge UP, 2004.
Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist.
Cambridge UP, 2003.
Evans, G. Blakemore, ed. 1974. The Riverside Shakespeare.
Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton, Mifflin.
Fernie, Ewan et al. Reconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical
Reader. Oxford UP, 2005.
Greg, W.W., ed. 1931. Dramatic Documents from the
Elizabethan Playhouses: Stage Plots; Actors' Parts; Prompt
Books. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.
*Greg, W.W. 1942 (1962). The Editorial Problem in
Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.
[Fundación Shakespeare]
*Greg, W.W. 1955. Shakespeare's First Folio: Its
Bibliographical and Textual History. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Greg, W.W. 1970. A Bibliography of the English Printed
Drama to the Restoration. 4 vols. London: The
Bibliographical Society. (1st ed. 1939)
Hinman, Charlton 1963. The Printing and Proof-Reading of
the First Folio of Shakespeare. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
*Honigmann, Ernst A. J. 1965. The Stability of
Shakespeare's Text. London: Edward Arnold.
Howard-Hill, Trevor H. 1971. Shakespearean Bibliography
and Textual Criticism: A Bibliography. Oxford: Clarendon.
Ioppolo, Grace 1991. Revising Shakespeare. Cambridge,
Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Irace, Kathleen O. 1994. Reforming the "Bad" Quartos:
Performance and Provenance of Six Shakespearean First Editions.
Newark; London and Toronto: University of Delaware Press;
Associated University Presses. [151/294]
Kidnie, Margaret Jane, and Sonia Massai, eds. 2015. Shakespeare
and Textual Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Long, William B. 1985. “Stage-Directions: A Misinterpreted
factor in Determining Textual Provenance.” TEXT 2:
121-37.
Martínez Luciano, Juan V. 1984. Shakespeare en la crítica
bibliotextual. Valencia: Instituto Shakespeare de la
Universidad de Valencia. [Filolog. Anglesa]
Massai, Sonia. Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor.
Cambridge UP, 2007.
Massai, Sonia. "Scholarly Editing and te Shift from Print to
Electronic Cultures." Textual Performances. Ed.
Lukas Erne, and Margaret Jane Kidnie. Cambridge UP, 2004.
94-108.
Massai, Sonia. "Textual Shakespeare." The Edinburgh
Companion to Shakespeare and the Arts. Ed. Mark Thornton
Burnett, Adrian Streete, and Ramona Wray. Edinburgh: Edinburgh
UP, 2011. 11-36.
McKerrow, R.B. 1931. “The Elizabethan Printer and Dramatic
Manuscripts.” The Library 12: 253-75.
McKerrow, Ronald B. 1939. Prolegomena for the
Oxford Shakespeare. A Study in Editorial Method. Oxford:
Clarendon Press. [Filolog. Anglesa]
McLeod, Randall 1981. “Unemending Shakespeare's Sonnet 111.”
SEL 21: 75-96.
Melchiori, Giorgio 1989. “Pre-Texts: Polonius on Genre.” Le
forme de teatro. Ed. V. Papetti. Roma: Edizioni di Storia
e Letteratura. IV: 45-60.
Murphy, Andrew, ed. 2007. A Concise Companion to
Shakespeare and the Text. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pollard, Alfred W. & Redgrave, G. R., ed. 1926. A
Short-Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland,
and Ireland 1475-1640. London.
Pollard, Alfred W. 1909. Shakespeare's Folios and Quartos: a
Study in the Bibliography of Shakespeare's Plays, 1594-1685.
London: Methuen.
Pollard, Alfred W. 1923. The Foundations of Shakespeare's
Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
*Taylor, Gary & Warren, Michael 1983. The Division of the
Kingdoms: Shakespeare’s Two Versions of "King Lear". Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Taylor, G. and Jowett, J. 1993. Shakespeare Reshaped. Oxford,
Clarendon Press.
Trousdale, Marion 1987. “Diachronic and Synchronic: Critical
Bibliography and the Acting of Plays.” Shakespeare: Text,
Language, Criticism. Essays in Honor of Marvin Spevack. Ed. B.
Fabian & K. T. v. Rosador. Zürich: Olm-Weidmann.
Trousdale, Marion 1990. “A Second Look at Critical
Bibliography and the Acting of Plays.” Shakespeare Quarterly 41:
72-90.
Urkowitz, Steven 1980. Shakespeare's Revision of "King Lear".
Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton UP.
Walker, Alice 1953. Textual Problems of the First
Folio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, J.K. 1971. The Quarto Copy for the First Folio of
Shakespeare. Dublin: Dublin University Press.
Warren, Michael 1978. “Quarto and Folio King Lear: an
Interpretation of Albany and Edgar.” Shakespeare, Pattern of
Excelling Nature. Ed. D. Bevington & J. Halio. Newark:
University of Delaware Press. 95-107.
Warren, Michael 1990. “The Theatricalization of Text:
Beckett, Jonson, Shakespeare.” Library Chronicle of the
University of Texas 20.i-ii: 39-59.
*Wells, Stanley & Taylor, Gary 1979. Modernizing
Shakespeare's Spelling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[Fundación Shakespeare]
Wells, Stanley 1984. Re-editing Shakespeare for the modern
reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Fundación Shakespeare]
*Wells, Stanley, Taylor, Gary, Jowett, John & Montgomery,
William 1987. William Shakespeare. A Textual Companion. Oxford:
Clarendon Press. [Filolog. Anglesa]
*Werstine, Paul 1990. “Narratives About Printed Shakespeare
Texts: 'Foul Papers' and 'Bad Quartos'.” Shakespeare Quarterly
41: 65-86.
Werstine, Paul 1995. “Shakespeare.” Scholarly Editing: A
Guide to Research. Ed. D.C. Greetham. New York: MLA.
Wilson, F. P. 1970. Shakespeare and the New Bibliography.
Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Filolog. Anglesa]
On Shakespeare’s language
Abbott, E. A. 1966 [1869]: A Shakespeare Grammar. London,
Macmillan.<http://perseus.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/cgi-bin/perscoll?collection=Renaissance>
Adamson, Sylvia et alli, eds. 2001. Reading Shakespeare’s
Dramatic Language: A Guide. London: Thomson Learning.
Blake, Norman F. 1983: Shakespeare's Language. An
Introduction. New York, Sant Martin's Press.
Blake, Norman F. 1996: Essays on Shakespeare's Language. 1st
series. Misterton, The Language Press.
Blake, Norman F. 1996c: Shakespeare's Language: Past
Achievements and Future Directions. > Pérez Guerra, Javier et
al. ed. Proceedings of the XIXth International Conference of
AEDEAN. Vigo, Universidade de Vigo. 21-35.
Blake, Norman F. 2002: A Grammar of Shakespeare’s Language.
Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Bolton, W. F. 1992: Shakespeare's English: Language in the
History Plays. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Cercignani, Fausto 1981: Shakespeare's Works and Elizabethan
Pronunciation. Oxford, Clarendon.
Görlach, Manfred 1993: Introduction to Early Modern English.
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
OED 1992: The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed.
CD-ROM. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Onions, C. T. 1988: A Shakespeare Glossary. Rev. ed. by
Robert D. Eagleson. Oxford, Oxford University Press. See
<http://perseus.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/cgi-bin/perscoll?collection=Renaissance>
Schmidt, Alexander 1971 [1874]: Shakespeare Lexicon and
Quotation Dictionary. Dover Publications Inc.
Spevack, Marvin 1980: A Complete and Systematic Concordance
to the Works of Shakespeare. Volume 9 Substantive Variants.
Hildesheim - New York, Georg Olms Verlag.
Spevack, Marvin 1993: A Shakespeare Thesaurus. Hildesheim,
Zürich, New York, Georg Olms Verlag.
Williams, G. 1994: A Dictionary of Sexual Language and
Imagery in Shakespearean and Stuart Literature. London, The
Athlone Press.
Texts
Shakespeare’s quartos:
Allen, Michael J. B. & Muir, Kenneth, eds. 1981:
Shakespeare's Plays in Quarto. Berkeley, University of
California Press.
Shakespeare’s First Folio (1623):
Hinman, Charlton, ed. 1968: The First Folio of Shakespeare:
The Norton Facsimile. New York, Norton and Company, Inc.
Primary Sources (between parenthesis, British Library
shelfmarks) of “Hamlet”
Q1 The Tragicall Historie of Hamlet Prince
of Denmarke By William Shake-speare. As it hath beene diuerfe
times acted by his Highnesse seruants in the Cittie of London:
as also in the two Vniuersities of Cambridge and Oxford,and
else-where. At London printed for N.L. and Iohn Trundell. 1603.
(C.34.K.1)
Hamlet. First Quarto 1603. William
Shakespeare. A Scolar Press Facsimile. Menston, The Scolar Press
Ltd, 1969.
Q2 The Tragicall Historie of Hamlet, Prince
of Denmarke. By William Shakespeare. Newly imprinted and
enlarged to almost as much againe as it was, according to the
true and perfect Coppie. At London, Printed by I.R. for
N.L. and are to be sold at his shoppe vnder Saint Dunstons
Church in Fleetstreet. 1605 [some copies dated 1604] (C.34.K.2)
William Shakespeare: Hamlet. Second Quarto
1605. A Scolar Press Facsimile. Menston, The Scolar Press Ltd,
1972.
F1 Mr William Shakespeares Comedies,
Histories, & Tragedies. Published according to the True
Originall Copies. […] London. Printed by Isaac Iaggard, and Ed.
Blount. 1623. (C.7.c.14)
Bertram, Paul, and Bernice W. Kliman, eds. 1990. The
Three-Text Hamlet: Parallel Texts of the First and Second
Quartos and First Folio. New York: AMS Press.
Kliman, Bernice W. 1996. “The Enfolded Hamlet edited by
Bernice W. Kliman.” The Shakespeare Newsletter Extra Issue:
1-44. http://global-language.com/enfolded.html
Kiman, Bernice W. "The Enfolded Hamlet". Hamlet Works.
<http://triggs.djvu.org/global-language.com/ENFOLDED/enfolded.html>
Modern Critical Editions
Andrews, John F. ed. 1993. William Shakespeare. Hamlet. The
Everyman Shakespeare. London and Vermont, J.M.Dent and Charles
E. Tuttle.
Edwards, Philip ed. 1985. Hamlet. New Cambridge Shakespeare.
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Evans, G. Blakemore ed. 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare. 2nd.
ed. Boston, MS, Houghton, Mifflin.
Fanego, Teresa ed. 1982. Hamlet. Clásicos de la lengua
inglesa. Madrid, Alhambra.
Farnham, Willard ed. 1983 [1957]. William Shakespeare.
Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. The Pelican Shakespeare.
Harmondsworth, Penguin.
Jenkins, Harold ed. 1982. Hamlet. The Arden Shakespeare.
London, Methuen.
Hibbard, G. R. ed. 1987. Hamlet. The Oxford Shakespeare.
Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Hubler, Edward ed. 1963. Hamlet. The Signet Classic
Shakespeare. New York, The New American Library Inc.
Hoy, Cyrus ed. 1992 [1963]. Hamlet. Norton Critical Editions.
New York, W.W. Norton & Company.
Kittredge, George Lyman ed. 1946. William Shakespeare:
Sixteen Plays. Boston, Ginn, ca.
Miola, Robert ed. 2010. Hamlet. Norton Critical
Editions. New York, W.W. Norton & Company.
Mowat, Barbara & Werstine, Paul ed. 1992. The Tragedy of
Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare. The New Folger
Library. New York, Washington Square Press, Pocket
Books.<http://www.folgerdigitaltexts.org/?chapter=5&play=Ham&loc=p7>
Parrot, T. M. & Craig, Hardin eds. 1938. The Tragedy of
Hamle': A Critical Edition of the Second Quarto, 1604. London,
Princeton University Press, Oxford University Press.
Spencer, T. J. B. ed. 1980. Hamlet. The New Penguin
Shakespeare. Harmmondsworth, Penguin Books.
Thomson, Ann, and Neil Taylor, eds. 2006. William
Shakespeare: Hamlet: The Second Quarto Text. The Arden
Shakespeare [3rd series]. London: Thomson Learning.
Thomson, Ann, and Neil Taylor, eds. 2006 William
Shakespeare: Hamlet:The Texts of 1603 and 1623. The Arden
Shakespeare [3rd series]. London: Thomson Learning.
Tronch Pérez, Jesús. 2002. A Synoptic “Hamlet”: A
Critical-Synoptic Edition of the Second Quarto and First Folio
Texts of “Hahmlet.” Valencia: SEDERI; Publicacions de la
Universitat de València.
Wells, Stanley & Taylor, Gary eds. 1986. William
Shakespeare. The Complete Works. Oxford, Oxford University
Press.
Wilson, John Dover ed. 1963 [1934]. Hamlet. New Shakespeare.
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Criticism on the texts of “Hamlet”
Brown,
John Russell 1955. “The Compositors of Hamlet Q2 and The Merchant of Venice.”
Studies in Bibliography
VII: 17-40.
*Chambers, E. K. 1930: William Shakespeare: a Study of Facts
and Problems. 2 vols. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Clayton, Thomas ed. 1992: The Hamlet First Published (Q1,
1603): Origins, Form, Intertextualities. Newark, University of
Delaware Press.
Duthie, G. I. 1941: The 'Bad' Quarto of Hamlet. Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
*Edwards, Philip ed. 1985: Hamlet. New Cambridge Shakespeare.
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
*Greg, W. W. 1955: Shakespeare's First Folio: Its
Bibliographical and Textual History. Oxford, Oxford University
Press.
Jackson, MacD. P. 1989. “Editing Hamlet in the 1980's:
Textual Theories and Textual Practices.” Hamlet Studies 11.i-ii
(Summer-Winter): 60-72.
Jenkins, Harold 1955: The Relation between the Second Quarto
and the Folio Text of Hamlet. Studies in Bibliography 7: 69-83.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib7toc.htm
Jenkins, Harold 1960: Playhouse Interpolations in the Folio
Text of Hamlet. Studies in Bibliography 13: 31-47.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib13toc.htm
*Jenkins, Harold ed. 1982: Hamlet. The Arden Shakespeare.
London, Methuen.
*Hibbard, G. R. ed. 1987: Hamlet. The Oxford Shakespeare.
Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Hubbard, Frank ed. 1920: The First Quarto Edition of
Shakespeare's Hamlet. University of Wisconsin Studies in
Language and Literature. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.
Irace, Kathleen O. 1992: Origins and Agents of Q1 Hamlet.
> Clayton. T, ed. 1992: 90-122.
Melchiori, Giorgio 1989. “Pre-Texts: Polonius on Genre.” Le
forme de teatro. Ed. V. Papetti. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e
Letteratura. IV: 45-60.
Melchiori, Giorgio 1992: Hamlet: The Acting Version and the
Wiser Sort. > Clayton. T, ed. 1992: 195-210.
Parrot, T. M. & Craig, Hardin eds. 1938: The Tragedy of
'Hamlet': A Critical Edition of the Second Quarto, 1604. London,
Princeton University Press, Oxford University Press.
Taylor, Gary 1983: The Folio copy for Hamlet, King Lear, and
Othello. Shakespeare Quaterly 34: 44-61.
Taylor, Gary 1987: [Editorial introduction to] Hamlet. In
Wells, S. & Taylor, G. 1987: 1-161, 396-420.
Thompson, Ann. "Teena Rochfort Smith, Frederick Furnivall, and
the New Shakspere Society's Four-Text Edition of Hamlet."
Shakespeare Quarterly 49 (1998): 125-39.
Tronch Pérez, Jesús. 2002. A Synoptic “Hamlet”: A
Critical-Synoptic Edition of the Second Quarto and First Folio
Texts of “Hahmlet.” Valencia: SEDERI; Publicacions de la
Universitat de València.
Walker, Alice 1953. Textual Problems of the First
Folio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, Alice 1955. “Collateral Substantive Texts (with
special reference to Hamlet.)” Studies in Bibliography 7: 51-67.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/bsuva/sb/toc/sib7toc.htm
*Wells, Stanley, Taylor, Gary, Jowett, John & Montgomery,
William 1987. William Shakespeare. A Textual Companion. Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
*Werstine, Paul 1988. “The Textual Mystery of Hamlet.”
Shakespeare Quarterly 39: 1-26.
*Wilson, John Dover 1934: The Manuscript of Shakespeare's
Hamlet and the Problems of Its Transmission. An essay in
critical bibliography. 2 vols. Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press.
