Current Unpublished Work




Equilibrium Mergers in a Composite Good Industry with Efficiencies,

co-authored with Cristina Pardo-García

Abstract: This paper studies equilibrium merging behavior in composite good industries. Component producers face the option to either merge with a similar component producer (horizontal merger) or a complementary one (complementary merger) of a composite good. Focusing only on strategic reasons, complementary mergers arise at equilibrium only when composite goods are very differentiated while horizontal mergers otherwise. Next, when efficiencies are considered, the level of marginal cost saving required for a horizontal merger in a composite industry to result in a non-increase in the upward price pressure index (UPPI) is greater as compared with the one in a regular industry. This result can be used by antitrust authorities to be more demanding when dealing with horizontal mergers in composite goods industries.

Keywords: composite goods, substitutes, complements, horizontal merger, complementary merger, efficiency effects, UPPI, diversion ratio.

 



“Licensing Standards to Competitors”
,

Abstract: We consider licensing of any technology that exhibits network externalities. We study the case where the licensor is one of the n firms competing in an oligopolistic market. In such a context a new incentive for licensing (added to the ex-ante  and ex-post ones) appears when the network is increased by the licensing policy, the network incentive. Sufficient conditions for market standardization are provided. A drastic innovation may be licensed even when the nonlicensing policy would imply the licensor being a monopolist. It is not always guaranteed that the licensor sets a royalty amount that extracts all technological rents from licensees. Finally, an example with a three firm industry and a linear externality is solved finding that fees are superior to royalties from both the social and the licensor point of view.

Keywords: Licensing, network externalities, standardization.


 “Manufacturers’ Commitments and the Number of Retailers”, co-authored with  Rafael Moner-Colonques and Yair Tauman.

Abstract:  We examine the strategic incentives of two manufacturers in a homogeneous good market to use independent agents to compete in the market. We find that the Subgame Perfect Nash equilibrium involves that each manufacturer is not an active seller and uses only one retailer. Furthermore, the variable part of the two-part tariff is set below the marginal cost of production. The equilibrium is Pareto dominated by the outcome obtained when manufacturers sell themselves directly to consumers without using retailers.

Keywords: Retail distribution, strategic incentives.