|
 |
JOIN THE DEBATE - YOUR RESPONSE TO IMPORTANT
NEWS OF THE DAY |
Do you think overregulation is strangling Canada's
economy?
Jazz Siekham thought his new business idea was a winner. He'd start a
mini-bus company that provided door-to-door transportation -- like a taxi
but cheaper. By operating vans that could each carry seven passengers, he
could keep costs down. He'd charge a flat rate of $3.50 for a ride
anywhere within the city of Vancouver.
Siekham approached the city for approval in January 1997. The
Engineering Department responded by asking him to research the idea. So he
paid $150,000 for three studies, which concluded that his idea would work.
Despite these findings, and the support of numerous business and community
associations, the city government worried about the idea's effect on
existing services and pondered new regulations. Siekham's plan was never
approved.
"The taxi companies fought it tooth and nail," he says.
Down but not out, Siekham launched his service in three suburban
municipalities: West Vancouver, the District of North Vancouver and the
City of North Vancouver. He obtained a licence in each jurisdiction only
to run afoul of the B.C. Motor Carrier Commission, which wouldn't let him
carry passengers across municipal boundaries.
"It's a crazy situation where a worthwhile innovation is being stopped
by regulation and by people's fear of competition," says Warren Gill, a
professor at Simon Fraser University who specializes in transportation.
Gill says shuttle services like Siekham's operate very successfully in
Miami and Seattle.
From coast to coast, eager entrepreneurs are strangled by red tape. In
a 1995 report, the Treasury Board of Canada stated, "There are more than
40,000 pages of federal regulations that Canadians find difficult to
understand and that are often redundant and obsolete."
The provinces, too, are guilty of overregulating business. In British
Columbia, for example, the Workers Compensation Act was amended in April
1998. The result: 1,400 more regulations on top of the existing 4,000.
With municipal bylaws adding to the burden across the country, the cost
of all this bureaucracy is crushingly high -- about $83 billion a year, or
$4,250 for every taxpayer, according to the Vancouver-based Fraser
Institute.
Jim Hatch, a professor at the Richard Ivy School of Business at the
University of Western Ontario, says: "Regulations may start out to protect
the public, improve services or provide a reasonable income for people in
the business, but they often evolve into a way of protecting a
special-interest group." Cabdrivers with a licence, for example, don't
want to see new ones issued to anyone else. Says Hatch: "The consumer
loses out -- through higher prices and less choice."
Red tape can be cut. Newfoundland eliminated 171 required permits and
licences in 1992. In 1994 and 1995, the province reviewed 2,400
regulations and ditched 1,100 of them as well. For example, Newfoundland
no longer regulates the number of truckers. Anyone with a truck that meets
the province's safety standards can carry freight.
Newfoundland also established one-stop shopping for most of the permits
that still apply. Entrepreneurs can get environmental, land-use, health
and safety permits in one office. "We're trying to make it less onerous
for people to start a business," says Weldon Moores, a senior director in
the province's Department of Government Services and Lands. "Then they can
get on with actually running their businesses."
The University of Western Ontario's Jim Hatch says Canadian businesses
and consumers suffer under an immense amount of regulation. "If you want
to start a farm in Ontario and have chickens that lay eggs, you have to
get permission from the province. In all likelihood they won't let you,
because they already have farms that have quotas for eggs. We have
countless rules that the average person is not aware of until he tries to
do something.
"This dampens initiative -- and it's a major reason why Canada is not a
dynamic business environment."
Do you think overregulation is strangling Canada's economy?
Date: May 08, 2000 Name: Name withheld
Comments: Hi Of course I thnk regulations are strangling
canadians That story is just one of them I think the governement thnks far
too much of itself. Here is someone trying to help people with a good idea
and it is trashed. In England we have mail carriers that double as a bus
to outlying districts. That is on the rural routes. great Idea. When
will governments and other people in office learn that they are not little
gods.
Date: April 18, 2000 Name: Bryon Kernaghan
Comments: British Columbia has so many regulations now that
new businesses are looking for greener pastures. An example of a very
silly regulation came to my attention a few years ago when I was a manager
in the B. C. government. The complainant was a miner who wanted to get up
to his claims and minesite in the mountains near here to do the mandated
work on his various claims. The provincial government required that he do
a set amount of work per year to hold the claims and part of the credit
given was building mine roads in the area. The government then gave
forestry sub-contractors instructions through regulations that they must
make any roads they put in impassable when they completed their work. The
ministry of the Environment was also given the right through regulations
to tear out roads completely at their whim. The miner was left totally
in limbo when his required roads that he had put in and had been given
credit for in government regulations were torn up and he could no longer
prove up his mining holdings. The government department that ordered his
roads torn up couldn't have cared less that the road installation had
already been approved by another government department. It's like Alice
In Wonderland.
Date: April 15, 2000 Name: Name withheld
Comments: Overregulated....In some aspects. We must not be
completely narrow minded. While it good to be able to make our own choices
we must remember that there are people who are not sure of what the right
choice is. Regulation can sometimes put a certain type of control on
people who are very willing to take advantage of the fellowman. Without
regulation,these people will not be held accountable for there actions
against the consumer
Date: April 09, 2000 Name: carol mellor
Comments: Anything we can do to cut taxes in this
country will help us become a dynamic, prosperous country.
Date: March 11, 2000 Name: Jane Harrison
Comments: The issue of "red tape" has been a concern of mine
for years. It is further compounded by the tremendous amount of effort
required to gather and report on sales taxes, income taxes (both personal
and corporate), payroll taxes and Stats Canada reporting to name a
few.
We are constantly hearing that Canada is less productive than
the U.S. and therefore we have a lower standard of living but we don't
have to look far to see why.
We spend many hours on non-value added
work and then have to pay more taxes for the maintenance and enforcement
of all the rules, regulations and requirements that are slowly choking
us.
Areas such as the income tax act are constantly added to but
very seldom is anything taken out. At least 1/2 of the population is
forced to hire a professional to file their tax returns in what is
supposed to be a self-assessing system.
I would like to see a
millenium project where every level of government, regulation and taxation
is required to reduce their rules by at least 50%. Our current system is
rapidly becoming unworkable.
Date: March 10, 2000 Name: Name withheld
Comments: Yes - almost every sector of Canadian life is
over-regulated by a country that is grossly over-governed. We have too
many governments passing laws and collecting fees, tolls and taxes of
every conceivable kind.
Date: February 17, 2000 Name:
Comments: Gambling is like a ball and chain in the Garden of
Eden --- you can try to break away, but the battle can sometimes feel like
you'll never win.
Date: February 16, 2000 Name: Mari Lynne
Comments: I believe overregulation will strangle the economy
of any country. I live in Spokane, Washington. About 6 months ago Forbes
magazine rated Spokane 161st out of 162 cities unfriendly to business
because of overregulation. How's THAT for a reputation? To build a project
in either the city or county of Spokane is one of the most time consuming
and frustrating things a builder can take on. Small business is strangled
by high taxes and red tape which ensures the eating up any profit an owner
may make. Hire employees and your nightmare begins.
Date: February 14, 2000 Name: Sheila M. McCormack
Comments: The time has come for Canada to follow
Newfoundland's lead and get rid of some of these ancient
regulations. It would be good for our country and a feather in
Newfoundland's cap as well - provided of course that the folks in
Ottawa don't take the credit for the idea.
Date: February 14, 2000 Name: Lester Unger
Comments: Yes,I think the government is overregulating
business ventures.This is resulting in lost opportunities for people who
have the courage to start up new businesses that are different.This is
causing lost jobs for Canadians as well.Regulation started out as a good
thing—to keep people from taking advantage of other Canadians, but it has
outgrown its usefulness.It has also failed in what it was intended to do.
Many Canadians are being taken advantage of even with all the regulations
the government has in place. So regulating is not the answer and should be
only used to study Canadian business growth, not to keep it from growing.
Date: February 14, 2000 Name: Doug Durham
Comments: As a municipal employee, or bearucrat in some
peoples eyes, I see many flaws in your article. Yes, we do have many rules
which are "by the letter." If we were to waiver from them, our liability
would go up and we would be personally liable for having allowed things
which were not per the bylaws. Our society fails in that we try to please
everyone and fail to enforce the rules.I agree that there are many more
licences and bylaws, but thanks to the federal government, which handed
reduced taxes to the provincial government which in turn "reduced" taxes
to the municipal government, we must now through "user" fees, etc. make up
for the lack of funds. There is no reduction in taxes. In fact taxes have
probably gone up more than ever. Cash cows are hard to get rid of.
Date: February 10, 2000 Name: Bonnie Maynard
Comments: Yes, we are being overregulated! We should be
relying more heavily on our own judgement than on Gov't safety
regulations!! Give me back my CHOICE!! Things will govern themselves! If I
don't like the look of the restaurant or taxi, I won't go
there!!!
Child Poverty - Gov't has wanted input as to how to
improve this issue - our kids aren't being fed!! DEREGULATE!!! That way
Dad could run a little trucking business, and Mom could sell baking for a
living, etc. Big business doesn't have to worry - the small businesses
would only be getting the business that can't currently afford to
patronize the big business!!! But THAT would be enough to give back
self-esteem and would be enough to feed the kids.
Deregulation
would give ALL Canadian Citizens back the feeling that we are in control
of our lives, therefore improving ALL things in Canada.
Date: February 10, 2000 Name: Elsie dillon
Comments: Yes,Please help help the Red tape so pur people
can get on with creating there own jobs.
Date: February 10, 2000 Name: Robert Pariseau
Comments: Due to the overwhelming number of completely
unnecessary regulations and the vigor with which they are constantly
enforced, Canada will not get the boost it needs to compete in the 21st
century until one basic rule is respected by Jean Chretien: TAKE YOUR
CITIZENS SERIOUSLY!
Date: February 09, 2000 Name: Name withheld
Comments: As a foreigner I was actually planning to
immigrate to Canada to set up my own small IT business...which suddenly
doesn't seem such a good idea anymore. Too bad, because I'd prefer Canada
100 times or more over the U.S.
Date: February 09, 2000 Name: Rick Clarke
Comments: It's not hard to see that a large percentage of
our problems in the rules and regulations of our country and it's
provinces have been implimented by LAWYERS. These are some of the most
manipulative people in society and most would agree that there are far too
many of them. They are always looking for ways to justify there means as
is the case with most municipalities in this country They put some of the
most ridiculous regulations in place just so that they can then tell you
that certain procedures are not allowed. Of course you could pay for more
studies. What a load of crap that is. We need to remove most of the large
body of regulators and make these people start their own buisness. Do
something good for the economy or get out of the way.
Date: February 09, 2000 Name: Eric Best
Comments: Response to Dec/99 issue 'The Great Gas Gouge',
,considering fuel price without tax has risen from 21c/l as of Feb'99 to
46.7c'/lJan'oo while the tax remains at 19.4c/l,who is gouging who?
Can.Oil Co. blame it on world oil price which is app. 1/2 what it was
25yrs. ago. One wonders if this 121% increase has been passed onto to
salaries. I think the theives are the Oil Co.. The economy will suffer due
to the probable inflation rise as costs are passed on and in turn interest
rates will be used to try to curb inflation. While, I agree fuel tax is
high,and probably mismanaged this is increase has nothing to do with
taxes.Maybe its time to slap the culprits fingers.
Date: February 06, 2000 Name: Ken Leippi
Comments: Yes we are overregulated!!It seems if you go into
business for yourself that you are forever paying a fee to some gov't
agency or another.Usually it seems that few of the agencies have anything
to do with the business that you're trying to conduct.
Date: February 06, 2000 Name: Bill Aumen
Comments: You only have to do a joint busines deal with a US
partner to realize the truth of Professor Hatch's statetment, "This
dampens initiative -- and it's a major reason why Canada is not a dynamic
business environment."
I believe we Canadian's have the good sense
to conduct business ethically without as much red tape (and there still
seems to be a certain amount of fraud in spite of the voluminous
regulations).
I am certain we also will thrive from free-trade when
we get beyond the expectation that the government and unions should
"protect me" from competition. The products and services we have to offer
will stand on their own merit anywhere in the world.
Date: February 04, 2000 Name: David Briant
Comments: Interesting story and shows one side of the
problem. Also it's not much different then the United States. About
seven years ago I was looking at starting another small business in
Guelph, Ontario selling popcorn from a mobile cart. It didn't get past the
investigation stage due to cart bylaws still being designed. They only had
guessimates as to what would be required and the costs. After months of
waiting no answer was forth coming so I shelved the idea. On a trip
shortly there after while passing through Frankenmuth, Michigan I stopped
into the local chamber of commerce and casually asked about setting up a
popcorn cart business. They said no problem you just need a permit and
help with the paper work. The permit was cheap and there was supplier for
all I needed in Detroit. It looked good until I went to the next step
which was financing. This venture was going to cost more then I had, since
I was converting to US dollars. The amount of security needed to keep the
banks happy made the whole deal not worth it. The banks in Canada are the
same way. Then last year Canada Trust called my office and said the
business had been approved for a line of credit and increased my credit
card limit. In one instance I now had access to over $20,000. I don't
need the money now because the business focus has changed. However, this
shows when you need it you can't get it and when you don't you got it.
Date: February 04, 2000 Name: L.Scott
Comments: I cannot address all of the article but I did
spend 32 years in the Transit industry. There is a constant pressure by
private operators to set up businesses which will "cream" the
transportation market and thereby create a profitable enterprise for them.
Transit systems are controlled by performance criteria which assure that a
level of transportation is available through a large segment of the day
over most of the residential area. A large segment of the ridership is
unable to access regular transportation due to age (young or
old),income,health or other situation. This portion of the business is not
allways profitable but it does address a social need. Transit systems need
the high revenue times to supplement the very low ridership times and
areas. Examine the offer by the private sector and you will find that
there is no guarantee of service if it is not profitable. The revenue
generated by a private operator is at the expense of the public transit
and will be reflected in higher operating expenses, and therefore higher
taxes. Articles such as this do not present the whole picture and create
pressures which elected officials find difficult to resist. The simple
logic appeals to everyone who has not reviewed the total picture.
Date: February 03, 2000 Name: Sharolyn Sánchez
Comments: What more can you say but "Yes!"? Government
regulators are KILLING our economy. When I read these articles I am
infuriated. How can anyone do business is this country? Not a surprise
that so many go south of the border.
Date: February 03, 2000 Name: Alexander Schmid
Comments: I am pleased that the province of Newfoundland is
eliminating their red tape. Hopefully this could improve their ecomonic
problems and reduce the high unemployment. The other provinces should
follow suit.
Date: February 03, 2000 Name: Karen Lalonde
Comments: Claudia Cornwall's 'Strangles by Red Tape' sums up
the thoughts of small business owners across the country. The bureaucratic
red tape is the beginning of a vicious circle. It has been said that
Canada is the most highly regulated country in the world.All these
regulations create a need for more bureaucrats which is accompanied with a
high price tag. The bloated bureacracy contributes to increased taxation
rates placing Canada as the highest taxed country in the G-7. Because of
high income tax rates and payroll taxes, small business does not have the
cash flow to expand. This is why 78% of small Canadian businesses employ
less than 5 employees. The circle is thus completed and bound together
with 'red tape'.
Date: February 02, 2000 Name: Rick Clarke
Comments: As a small buisnessman in Victoria B.C. for 15
years, I have also gradually noticed that everytime there's any kind of
slowdown, it's usually some form of red tape. Goverment is too big, we
know this and yet we still just go along for the ride. What is it going
to take to wake this great country of ours up? I do know smart buisness
and this government or any other for that matter doesn't seem to get it at
all. Good buisness is run by smart people making informed choices on
how to do buisness to benifit themselves and their community. Government
hires the wrong candidates for the jobs all the time instead of having
qualified people fill the positions and thenthey wonder where they went
wrong. Get rid of red tape ! It doesn't work. It is broken and needs to
be fixed.
Date: February 01, 2000 Name: Monika Pettit
Comments: Yes small business and the general population are
being strangled by red tape. Farming is another area that is being
strangled into non-existance by red tape and idiotic by-laws. Our
neighbours may lose their farm because they bought power of sale and must
renovate the house as well as reclaim the pasture lands. They were told to
submit a three year plan in order to keep the farm tax credit but are now
in danger of losing it because they are finding it impossible to get any
start up funding form any level of government. We officially live in
the GTA (Greater Toronto Area)but have very little to do with Toronto and
we are subsequently governed by laws made in towns with little or no
concern for our rapidly dwindling farm land. If we as a society do not
wish to import all of our food we had better sit up and take notice of
what is happening to our prime agricultural lands.
Date: February 01, 2000 Name: Michelle Wright
Comments: I had just read the article "Strangled by Red
Tape" when my son gave me the following joke to read. How
applicable!
The Modern Ark -------------- The Lord spoke to
Noah and said, "Noah, in six months I am going to make it rain until
the whole world is covered with water and all the evil things are
destroyed. But I want to save a few good people and two of every living
thing on the planet. So I am ordering you to build an Ark."
And,
in a flash of lightning, the Lord delivered the specifications for the
Ark.
"OK," Noah said, trembling with fear and fumbling with the
blueprints.
"I'm your man."
"Six months and it starts to
rain," warned the Lord. "You better have my Ark completed -- or learn
to swim for a long, long time!"
Six months passed, the sky began to
cloud up, and the rain began to fall in torrents. The Lord looked down
and saw Noah sitting in his yard, weeping. There was no
Ark.
"Noah!" shouted the Lord, "where is My Ark?"
A
lightning bolt crashed into the ground right beside Noah.
"Lord,
please forgive me!" begged Noah. "I did my best, but there were some
big problems. First, I had to get a building permit for the Ark's
construction, but your plans didn't meet their code. So, I had to hire
an engineer to redo the plans, only to get into a long argument with
him about whether to include a fire-sprinkler system.
"My neighbors
objected, claiming that I was violating zoning ordinances by building
the Ark in my front yard, so I spent months trying to get a variance
from the city planning board.
"After all that, I had a big problem
getting enough wood for the Ark, because there was a ban on cutting
trees, to save the spotted owl. I tried to convince the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service that I needed the wood to *save* the owls, but they
wouldn't listen. And they wouldn't let me catch any owls, either - so
no owls on the Ark.
"Then the carpenters' union started picketing
my home because I wasn't using union carpenters. I had to halt
construction and begin negotiating with the National Labor Relations
Board.
"Next, I started gathering up the animals -- but got sued by
an animal rights group that objected to me taking along only two of
each kind.
Just when that suit got dismissed, the EPA notified me
that I couldn't complete the Ark without filing an environmental impact
statement on your proposed flood. They didn't take kindly to the idea
that they had no jurisdiction over the conduct of a Supreme
Being.
"Then the Corps of Engineers wanted a map of the proposed
flood plan.
I sent them a globe - and they went
ballistic!
"The IRS has seized all my assets, claiming that I am
trying to leave the country, and I just got a notice from the state
that I owe some kind of use tax.
"Lord, I'm sorry, but I don't
think there's any way I can finish the Ark in less than five years - if
ever!"
With that, the sky cleared, the sun began to shine, and a
rainbow arched across the sky. Noah looked up and smiled. "You mean you
are not going to destroy the world?" he asked
hopefully.
"Wrong!" thundered the Lord. "But I'm going to do it
with something far worse than a mere flood. Something far more
destructive. Something that man himself created."
"What's that?"
Noah asked.
"Government!" said the Lord.
Date: February 01, 2000 Name: Dale Rumming
Comments: Over regulation has definately got out of hand,
and in more ways than one. We live in an area just outside of Parksville,
(who want to expand their boundaries, and take us over for our tax base),
dictated to by the district of Nanimo (who outnumber our one
representative that they allow comparted to their 8).We pay our taxes to
the Area of Port Alberni (over the mountain) and are told the district of
Nanaimo is putting in their city bylaws and regulations into our rural
area, even tho the people had many referandums already and have voted them
down by 2000 - 8, to be left alone. They are still going through with it!
We are trying to take them to court to preserve our rural community, but
we will lose, and just put off the inevitable. We also are trying to
provoke the charter of rights, but we are outnumbered. Our area uniquiness
will disappear in the corporate jungle of over regulation like everything
else!
Date: January 31, 2000 Name: Name withheld
Comments: I want to sincerely thank all those who have
submitted their comments, heartbreaking accounts of run ins with red tape,
and their frustrations.
I have endured so many years of this. I
submitted an earlier response (jokes2go@hotmail.com) Reading your stories
was not only frightening in the scope of this plague, but it was like
finding a support group (trendy term).
Here is how to tell your
government how you feel about this topic. www.gc.ca is the main web site
for the Government of Canada. You can locate the main site for each
cabinet minister. You can email him/her directly. www.on.ca is the main
Ontario site, and each provincial government has its own site. You can
find all the telephone fax and emails for all the politicians. Add their
email address to your addresses list. Email presents the opportunity for
direct contact with your politicians and bureaucrats. You can find all the
civil servants on these sites too, and you can email senior civil
servants. The higher you go the more receptive they are to your
complaints, and the more likely to act on them.
Canadians are on
the whole very meek and mild, and have allowed this red tape to get out of
hand.
Thanks again for all of our accounts and
comments. jokes2go@hotmail.com
Date: January 31, 2000 Name: Julie Yaskow
Comments: We are so riddled with regulations in this country
that it amazes me that Canada doesn't choke on them and seize up
altogether. As a small business owner in the computer industry, it
frustrates me to no end that I can get things from the USA cheaper than
what I buy them for here, or else Canada doesn't support the technology.
This country is not a true democracy, because it doesn't matter how we
respond to government policies and regulations, nothing ever changes. The
citizens of this country should not have to march on Parliament Hill to
get the Prime Minister's attention, but then again it might pay off!! If
he isn't aware of the people's disgust with the way he is running Canada
then he must be blinded by his own Red Tape.
Date: January 31, 2000 Name: E. Jacobs
Comments: Yes! overregulation is hurting our economy,
freedom and recreation greatly. The costs to our society are tremendous
and I hope that all of the various governments will follow the lead of
Newfoundland in this area. In the Yukon, the OH@S are drafting new
regulations and have searche the country for new ones to include. In some
cases they don't even know what the regulation, they want to enact, even
says. One person I know, who is a professional writer, wanted to start a
business in this area doing professional ads, reports, etc. By the time
The City of Whitehorse approved him to work out of his apartment, he had
to get al least three permits and licences, the permission of his
neighbours, the apartment building manager and the City. It cost several
hundred dollars so that he could use a word-processor.All areas of human
activity are being stifled by overregulation, most of it being justified
under the guise of protecting something from something else, but really in
my opinion,just to enlarge the bureaucracy.
Date: January 30, 2000 Name: Name withheld
Comments: What happened to democracy and the freedom to
pursue dreams? It seems all is lost to a sea of power, control, ... greed,
and fear. Monopoly rather than competition is the name of the game. Yes
regulations are needed, but overregulations should be weighed carefully
before instituting such policies.
Date: January 30, 2000 Name: Name withheld
Comments: Government regulations and medling in the free
enterprise system is costing this County losses that are beyond
calculation. Taxation (also a form of regulation) licencing, and red tape
at all levels of governemt are to the point where it is foolish to start
new ventures. And don't forget, this is a game where the rules can be
changed at anytime! I embarked on a 42 lot residential land development
in 89 in a small Ontario town with two partners. By all accounts, a
beautifully done project in a very desirable area that couldn't loose.
Some of our favourite demands by local govenment were sidewalks down both
side of the street that went nowhere as the next closest sidewalks were
half a mile away, and storm water outlets running uphill in the event of a
1 in 100 year flood! These and an endless flow of mindless regulations and
red tape held up our project almost a year beyond our project start
date! We were beat before we started! By the time we were ready to sell
lots, the local town government had created a $3000.00 per lot impost fee,
the Feds had created GST which applied to our "product", and the economy
had begun it's downward spiral. This new burden of almost $7000.00 per lot
could not be justified by the consumer and hence lot sales stopped dead!
In the few presales that we had to close, we lost money by absorbing the
$7000.00. It is now 11 years later and there are still two lots left
to sell. I went bankrupt, loosing my home, and life savings, as I had
risked everything to make this project go. The other partners still joke
about the big party at "McDonalds" we will all have when the last lost
finally sell. The project is now a beautiful residential neighbourhood,
feeding thousands of dollars into the local tax base. The respective
governments and banks made enormous profits while the risk taking
entrapenauers where left with nothing. So much for the "Canadian dream."
Date: January 30, 2000 Name: Sylvia Kerr
Comments: RE; Your article about overregulation. The
Worker's Compensation Board here in B.C. is so afraid of admitting that
their new non-smoking policies are killing small businesses,causing
impressive layoffs and increasing the welfare rolls that they now are
refusing to listen to any input from those directly affected. These new
rules mean that I, as a smoking person, cannot legally hire a workman to
come to my home to do any repairs that I can not do myself. Are they going
to pay for my injuries or God forbid, my funeral? Or would they pay me
compensation if I put in a claim for respitory problems? I would be
willing to bet my soul that such a claim would be denied! WCB is now
telling the population of B.C. how to live and how to run businesses! And
you thought we lived in a democracy!
Date: January 29, 2000 Name: Name withheld
Comments: My partner and I have been operating a small
business for fifteen years. About 1991, I decided to list all the
government agencies and departments we had to "do things for". These
"things" if not done subjected us to penalties, threats, interest charges,
licence suspensions, courts etc.
The endless hours of unpaid
government work from collecting taxes for the government to filling out
endless forms for useless purposes drained productivity, cash, time and
energy from us.
When my list reached FIFTY different government
agencies and departments, I had to stop, I was literally ill with the
realization of the huge, oppressive government interference in our lives
and business.
Even more frightening was to come face to face with
the number of departments and agencies that had the police power to audit,
inspect, issue violations, charge, fine, penalize, take to Court and
close your business down if they wanted to. Are you ready? Of the FIFTY
listed, THIRTY had internal enforcement personnel(police forces) who could
walk unannounced into our place of business.
Ready for the real
scarey part? Almost every one of these internal enforcement people ( many
have more power than your local police force) can issue violations and
charges that pronounce you guilty. Your alternative is to buckle under and
pay, or go to Court to prove you are innocent.
I always thought a
democracy meant you were innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Isn't that what our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
says?
If you are an incorporated Company, you can't represent your
company yourself in any COurt challenge. A corporation must be represented
by a lawyer. Thus huge legal bills are incurred to defend
yourself.
If you scrutinize the legislation that gives the police
power to these enforcement personnel of all levels of government, you will
have a very difficult time trying to find anything in the legislation or
supporting departmental manuals that sets out exactly how the enforcement
personnel must act. And what the punishmebt is if they err. It isn't
there.
There are no protections in the legislative acts that give
these police powers for the target of the enforcement other than the
opportunity to challenge them in Court.
If you go to www.gc.ca the
home page for the Government of Canada and look up the Canada Labour Code
you will see a fine example of what I describe.
Since 1991 I have
given out my list of the Fifty Government agencies ( all levels of
government) and departments that our tiny company ( employees 8 to 10) was
being suffocated by. I sent the list to the party leaders before the
provincial election in Ontario in the early 90's. I was gratified to see
Premier Harris set up a Red Tape Committee ( see the Ona\tario web site)
which tried to reduce red tape, but the changes didn't much affect our
Company. I was asked to send my list to the committee.
I sent my
list to Federal Finance Minister Paul Martin and was impressed by his
direct response, expressing shock at the burden we carried. The Federal
government did set up a Senate Committee on Small Business and Paul
Martin's office forwarded my list to it, but I have seen no
changes.
I have given my list to a vast number of civil servants
over the last decade. When a fellow showed up to do a payroll audit, I
said , "If I seem crabby, I want you to know it is not you personally, I
want you to know you are part of an overwhelming government interference
in my life and business". I showed him the list. He asked if he could have
the copy. A few minutes later he said, "You know, I have a really heavily
booked day today. Your payroll book looks fine, I don't think I need to
look at any more records", and he left.
Nothing has changed in ten
years. The governments at every level have imposed such a burden on us
that it has sucked the life blood from our Company. We don't have the time
, (there are two of us at the management/owner level and that's all we can
afford) to market, sell, network, or properly give the attention to the
Company's financial matters as we should. Or to look for alternate
funding.
Now our Company is in receivership. We were up to fifteen
employees , exxporting our product all over the world. We have an
excellent reputation and ran a good business. But its all gone now. And I
will lay a great deal of this failure at the doorstep of the many levels
of government: local, regional, coounty, provincial and federal that
suffocate our economy, our innovators and our small businesses with
excessive, mindless, busywork regulations that have no sense at
all.
An email friend from New Zealand expressed it well last week.
He wrote: "Bureaucrats are the plague of the working people. They serve no
useful purpose whatsoever in our society."
Comments to me can be
sent to jokes2go@hotmail.com. I thank the Readers Digest and Ms Cromwell
for an excellent article. Sadly, nothing will change. Canada is not a
democracy. It is a government that can only be described as Soft
Totalitarianism. (Big Brother). Government that says, "Government has to
do it because Government does not believe you, the citizens, know how to
conduct yourselves. "
Date: January 29, 2000 Name: Ringo Sun
Comments: Most developed countries suffer from
over-regulation. It comes in part from a desire on the part of government
[both elected and bureaucratic]to social engineer for "our own good" and,
in part, to generate revenues. They have to justify their existences and
their inflated salaries somehow.
Neither government nor trade
unions are willing to admit that the true backbone of the economy [at
least that part of the economy which employs people] is small business.
Instead, they place roadblocks and landmines in the way of every attempt
by people with initiative and ambition to better themselves and, along the
way, develop this country's economy. Without such initiatives many jobs
would not exist. Talk about cutting off one's nose to spite one's face.
Date: January 29, 2000 Name: Samantha Black
Comments: As a single mother, with two sons attending
full-time University (Medical and Law Faculties), I try to supplement my
income with doing whatever I can ... we have too many rules, rules
over-riding rules ... every gov't agency stops you somehow, someway from
making an honest dollar no matter how hard you work .... We now work until
nearly the end of July for the government ... let us be ... we are a free
democratic country ... those that have drive, ambition, motivation and an
unusual idea should be allowed to try and thrive!
Date: January 28, 2000 Name: G,. Piggott
Comments: I would like the person in Newfoundland that
decided to clean up the red tape to run for Prime Minister. They have my
vote!
Date: January 28, 2000 Name: J. J. Lomas
Comments: Your piece on Strangling on Red Tape brought back
memories of the time I was in the Cdn army when everything had to be done
in triplicate except going to the bathroom. Your question,"Is the
government strangling the economy with red tape" is aloaded question and
at stake is the jobs of all the beaurocrats who inforce these regulations.
Eliminate the red tape and you will put a great many paperpushers out of a
job and allow free enterprise to finally take a hold in this
country. These rules and regulations are there to "protect the People
from thoughtless and dishonest businesses" And if you believe that I
have some land, a bridge or two and a statue I can sell you but the
transaction must be in cash (small unmarked bills) no checks
please. The red tape is there to give 5 people a job that should and
could be done by one. If you eliminate 90% of all red tape and
regulations today within 6 months 30% would be back and within two years
you would have 110% of the former red tape and regulations. This is to
save the foney balony jobs of these paperpushers who couldn,t care less
about John Q Public as long as they keep thier cushy jobs and their
fantastic pensions. Are we being strangled by red tape?
Date: January 26, 2000 Name: Don Miller
Comments: It is becoming increasingly clear to me that we
don't have government "by the people...FOR the people"! Our government's
involvement in business should be to encourage business, not discourage
it. The biggest problem is that most of the people making the policies
have never had to follow them. Also, it is quite apparent that it is much
easier to make a law than it is to get rid of it. Isn't it time for a
change?
Date: January 25, 2000 Name: Donna Wallis
Comments: I do believe over regulation has ruined many
entrepreneurial efforts. The people making the regulations don't
realize how much profit they are loosing, but having an idea fail because
of overregulation. If communities helped people, instead of hindering
people in their efforts, there would be a lot more employment, more small
businesses, more development, more home additions, etc. but there's so
much red tape and believe this "rudeness" in trying to deal with the
beauraucrats, that people just say forget it. e.g. We have a farm, and
wanted to grow our own potatoes and have a chip truck on our property. No
way, you're agricultural and a chip trucks commercial. Then we wanted to
take 3 lots off of the 150 acres we have, reason being that the far end of
the farm cannot be utilized. Poor soil and low land. At least $5,000.00
per severance. There could be three homes on that land by now, paying
property taxes to the town, but no, you're agricultural, even though you
can't use the land for farming, and even though, the government would get
the profits from one lot, the town would get the money from the 2nd lot
sold, and the farm would possibly get most of the profit from the third
lot. This money could assist to repair fences, another well, barn repairs,
but no-way. Therefore quite often rules and regulations bar improvements,
increased profits to their own towns. Occasionally you hear of a town that
HELPS its residents. That's the town to live in. That town will
grow. Thank you. Donna Wallis
Date: January 25, 2000 Name: Mitchell Uhl
Comments: I have worked for the federal govenment and at one
time owned a small business. Having worked for the government I feel that
thier internal policy's are for what I call empire building.The larger the
portfolio they control the larger their budget et. al. I do not feel
policies are being enacted for the good of the people, but for the good of
the govt. or for business.
Sincerely Mitch Uhl
Date: January 24, 2000 Name: jim stevens
Comments: Ideffinately think the canadian goverment is over
regulating. I've looked into starting small business and because of
goverment regulations it would cost me 4 times the amount, to operate.
this brings about 4 more people unemployed and less taxes going into are
economy. ie: more people employed stronger the economy. less people
employed more money the goverment pays.
Date: January 24, 2000 Name: Roland Humphries
Comments: Actually, we are over governed, if as consumers we
vote with our dollars that should be enough. Special interest groups
should make their points by convincing the public, rather than
pressuring politicians. Example, the CRTC is a waste of time and money,
as is the CBC. Also, if the Federal Government would reliquish it's
strangle-hold on power, it could eliminate a lot of
overlapping paper-work. Isn't that what the "national unity" issue
is really all about.
Date: January 23, 2000 Name: Name withheld
Comments: I do believe that at the rate that we are
going with goverment making laws against peoples wishes, and
applying redtape to all endeavors, we are slowing becoming a third
world
Date: January 23, 2000 Name: armin quickert
Comments: i am sick and tired seing many other countries
passing canadas standart of living. it seems as though we are still
driving a model a ford on our super highways when the rest of the world is
leaving us in their rearview mirrors.
Date: January 23, 2000 Name: Name withheld
Comments:
Of coarse regulations are choking this
country,and should you not belive it just you go and try and start a new
business and that will remove any doubts that you may have. Frank.
Date: January 23, 2000 Name: James Edgar
Comments: Overregulation is definitely strangling Canada's
economy. Bureaucracies at Federal, Provincial and Municipal levels
consistently are more concerned with self-perpetuation than they are about
giving the taxpayer value for our money. The current woeful level of
the Canadian dollar is ample proof of this. If you include in the
bureaucracy problem the myriad of special interest groups that are funded
by tax dollars, the problem becomes truly staggering. Unfortunately,
government activity(?) accounts for almost 50% of our Gross Domestic
Product, and we live in a supposed democracy, where "first past the post"
wins elections. I worry that self-interest will cause the bureacracy
problem to grow to the extent that, like a cancerous growth, it will kill
the host.
Date: January 23, 2000 Name: Pierre Roy
Comments: Absolutely. Not only is there too much regulation,
no matter how well intended, it is a self generating phenonema. The more
there is, the more is created to track and administer it. With the
exception of Newfoundland, which seems to have made some strides in
ridding itself of nuisance buraucracy the Federal and other Provincial
Governments are mirred in overregulation. The cost to taxpayers is
stagering despite the fact that its value to Canadians is questionable. I
suppose it is safe to say that we have enough buraucracy in Canada for a
country of four times the population. I suppose to make a significant
change would require a Royal Commission, several hundred feasibility
studies, several standing committees, sitting committees, a thousand
lawyers, and on, and on, and on......
Date: January 22, 2000 Name: Bernard Landry
Comments: The very simple fact is that we are overregulated
and underrewarded. What started off years ago as temporary tax is now a
permanent pain in the butt(income tax). The Government should cut back
its organization by 50% staring with the elimination of the SENATE!!
Date: January 22, 2000 Name: Shirley Kolompar
Comments: As a small business owner in B.C. I have found
that over the last 20 years overregulation is becoming more and more of a
burden on small business which in turn effects the economy of each
province as well as the whole country. Overregulation costs businesses
money and then in turn costs the consumer. I feel that there is too much
duplication in all levels of government who do the regulating. Our country
is loosing its freedom of free enterprise. With all the overregulation
small business has no incentive to expand, higher more employees or
improve on their services.
Date: January 21, 2000 Name: Michael Stephensen
Comments: God Yes!! Government seems to have this
irresistable urge to stifel the entrepreneurial spirit of Canadians who
choose to make their way in life along the avenue of small business. I'm
only trying to make a living, [and oh yes! along the way pay my fair share
of taxes]
|