This line of research explores a series of discourses of special philosophical significance (such as the ones about states of affairs, material objects, mental and representational states, or evaluative judgments) in order to determine whether it is possible to coherently defend the view that the world as it is in itself, independently of us, does not contain the facts or properties presupposed in them. We focus, in particular, on the evaluation of three strategies that deny that the relevant discourses are true: eliminativism, fictionalism and expressivism.

metaphysics, antirealism, eliminationism, fictionalism, expressivism, states of affairs, truth, mental representation, first person, moral responsibility

• Theory of Knowledge
• Metaphysics