IN_JUSTICE
PID2021-126552OB-I00
The first one was that of denial or deception under the paradigm of the permanent state of exception. The second one emphasized the danger in the possible inaction of States and the consequent violation of human dignity. The third considered the pandemic as an accelerator of the crisis of democratic systems and the triumph of technological capitalism. Finally, the fourth line of argument announced the advent of a unique moment of collective catharsis. The purpose of this article is to rethink, with the perspective of time, the interpretative frameworks that illuminated a debate that still cannot be considered closed today.
inclusion, justice
- Garcia Pascual, Cristina
- PDI-Catedratic/a d'Universitat
- Cap de Seccio-Servei
- Jefe/a de Seccio-Servici-Vicerectorat de Cultura i Societat
- Serra Cristobal, Rosario Inmaculada
- PDI-Catedratic/a d'Universitat
- Responsables de Gestio Academica
- Coordinador/a Titulacio de Grau
Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation