Logo de la Universdad de Valencia Logo Instituto Interuniversitario López Piñero Logo del portal

.

Institut Interuniversitari López Piñero. Palau de Cerveró

.

Col·lecció cientificomèdica permanent en el Palau Cerveró

.

Dibuix de S. Ramón y Cajal

.

Biblioteca Historicomèdica "Vicent Peset Llorca"

.

Profesores de la Facultad de Medicina de Valencia (1922)

.

Caligrafías de la enfermedad

Seminario: ‘The Rise of Chance in Evolutionary Theory’

Seminario impartido por Charles H. Pence, Université catholique de Louvain.

 

Sesión presencial y on line

 

Enlace a la sesión:

https://eu.bbcollab.com/guest/8d2320da5b1f4c1ba59f54fc43994d2b

 

 

Seminario: ‘The Rise of Chance in Evolutionary Theory’

 

Over the century from Darwin’s first theoretical notebooks to the early works of the Modern Synthesis, evolutionary theory radically transformed. A theory about the appearance of adaptations in individual organisms, worked out without the aid of mathematics and an unclear view of the probabilistic nature of natural selection, became a statistical theory of natural selection’s action on populations, which in turn needed to be harmonized with Mendelian genetics. My recently published book, The Rise of Chance in Evolutionary Theory, tells the story of this remarkable transformation. Historians of biology have long recognized a number of key moments in this history, perhaps central among them the “rediscovery of Mendel” and the so-called “biometry-Mendelism controversy,” said to have locked the field of evolutionary theory in a fruitless battle that spanned some forty years. But, I argue, this classic history obscures more than it illuminates. On the one hand, the work of these biologists was much more complicated than “Mendelian vs. biometrician” would lead us to believe. The intellectual story of the developments in conceptual frameworks, methodological tools, and even underlying philosophical commitments proves to be one of the most complex and exciting periods of innovation in the history of evolutionary theory. And on the other hand, when we analyze that story in detail, we find that a tale of continuity is better supported than one of revolution. Efforts to develop a statistical, populational theory of natural selection were present for decades and remain relevant for philosophers and historians today.

 

BIO

 

Charles Pence is Chargé de cours (Assistant Professor) at the Université catholique de Louvain, in Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, where he directs the Center for Philosophy of Science and Societies (CEFISES). He also serves as a co-editor of the journal Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology (PTPBio). His work centers on the philosophy and history of biology, with a focus on the introduction and contemporary use of chance and statistics in evolutionary theory. His lab is also one of the foremost groups integrating this work with methods of the digital humanities, and is increasingly engaged in the ethical implications of biological science and technology.