University of Valencia logo Logo Permanent Training and Educational Innovation Service (SFPIE) Logo del portal

Is AI Being Used Responsibly in the Classroom? Practical Scenarios and Ethical Insights for Faculty Members

Target PDI
Method of impartition Online asynchronous + Presential
Language English
Total duration 12
Presential duration 10
Asynchronous online duration 2
Program PRIDA
Training modality Course
Academic course 2024-2025
Edition 01
Training plan year 2025
Start date of the course 10/11/2025
End date of the course 20/11/2025
Registration start date 09/09/2025
Registration end date 18/09/2025
Sessions
Session Start date and time End date and time Aula Location
1 10/11/2025 10:00 10/11/2025 13:00 Aula 1.1 SFPIE Lifelong Learning and Educational Innovation Service (SFPIE)
2 13/11/2025 10:00 13/11/2025 13:00 Aula 1.1 SFPIE Lifelong Learning and Educational Innovation Service (SFPIE)
3 20/11/2025 09:30 20/11/2025 13:30 Aula 1.1 SFPIE Lifelong Learning and Educational Innovation Service (SFPIE)
Professional profile of the recipients
PDI Universitat de València (UV) Recommended: B2 English level.
Selection criteria
Participants will be selected according to the following criteria:
- For courses with specific requirements, applicants must be verified as meeting them.
- Preference will be given to applicants who have not taken similar courses in the last three years.
- Likewise, preference will be given to those who have not taken training courses in the last three years.
- In the event of a tie between applicants based on the above criteria, applications must be submitted in strict order (date and time of submission).
UV Faculty
  • Gallent Torres, Cinta
  • PDI-Ajudant Doctor/A
Ver ficha
Training objectives

Objectives:

  • Understand key concepts related to AI and its implications in educational contexts.
  • Reflect critically on ethical dilemmas posed by AI use in the classroom, including issues such as AIgiarism, bias, and over-reliance.
  • Design and adapt lesson plans that incorporate AI while preserving ethical and academic standards.
  • Share and evaluate practical examples of AI integration through collaborative and peer-reviewed presentations.
  • Promote a culture of responsible, reflective, and transparent AI use within the University of Valencia.
Contents

Session Contents and structure:

Asynchronous Session (2 hours):

Pre-course Reading: Participants will read selected articles and case studies on AI in higher education to get ready for the in-person sessions.

September 23, 2025In-person Session (3 hours) 10:00 AM – 1:00 PM

  • Introduction to AI and its Conceptual Framework: Understanding the foundations of AI and its role in higher education.
  • Key Principles for Responsible AI Use: Explore the core principles of fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy in AI applications.
  • Essential European Guidelines on AI Ethics: A comprehensive overview of the most important AI ethics frameworks, including the Artificial Intelligence Act, UNESCO’s 2021 Recommendation on AI Ethics, Trustworthy AI Guidelines, the AI Competency Frameworks for Educators and Students (2024), and INTEF’s Guidelines on AI in Education.
  • Exploring Ethical Risks and Limitations of AI: What constitutes AI-related plagiarism? Analysing the limitations of AI tools in educational contexts, examining potential biases, over-reliance, and the implications for critical thinking and originality.

September 25, 2025In-person Session (3 hours) 10:00 AM – 1:00 PM

  • Best Practices for Implementing AI in the Classroom: Examples of how AI can facilitate student learning with a focus on collaborative projects and co-creation with AI tools.
  • Useful AI tools for faculty (Vidnoz, Natural Reader, DeepSeek, Poe, etc.) and AI tool directories (AIfindy, AllthingsAI, There is an AI for that, and ToolifyAI) and how they can support classroom activities.
  • Lesson plan design using Bloom’s Taxonomy.

October 3, 2025In-person Session (4 hours) 09:30 AM – 1:30 PM

 

Presentation of a Practical Case Using AI in the Classroom:

Participants will present a creative activity they have implemented or plan to implement using AI, providing a clear overview of its objectives, methods, and expected outcomes. The presentation should also include a reflection on how the ethical use of AI is ensured, addressing potential risks such as AIgiarism, bias, and over-reliance on technology.

 

Duration: 8 minutes per presentation, followed by peer feedback. Each participant will be assigned a fellow faculty member as commentator to provide constructive feedback on their presentation, followed by a group reflection.

A template will be provided to guide participants in constructively co-evaluating their colleagues’ work. This peer feedback, along with input from the facilitator, will help refine and improve their approach to integrating AI into teaching.

 

Methodology

Hands-on Exploration: Participants will collaboratively explore their current knowledge of AI and share examples of how they are integrating AI tools into their teaching practice.

Group Activity: Through case studies and discussions, participants will analyze ethical risks and practical scenarios involving AI misuse, with a particular focus on challenges like AIgiarism.

Group Feedback: Participants will exchange insights and provide peer feedback to help each other refine their understanding and improve the ethical use of AI in education.

 

This activity is also part of the initiatives of Red-IA (https://red-ia.org/) and the IA-FIP Project (https://ia-fip.org/), funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER “A way of making Europe” (ref. PID2022-141031NB-I00), aimed at promoting Academic Integrity in Initial Teacher Education.

 

Competencies to be developed

1

Understand the ethical frameworks and principles guiding responsible AI use in higher education, including fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy.

2

Identify and critically assess risks and challenges related to the use of AI in the classroom, such as AIgiarism, bias, over-reliance on AI tools, and impacts on academic integrity.

3

Apply ethical principles to real classroom contexts, designing or adapting lesson plans that integrate AI tools in a pedagogically sound and responsible way.

4

Collaborate with peers to analyze scenarios and provide constructive feedback on the ethical and practical integration of AI in education.

5

Reflect on their own teaching practices and how AI can be used to support student learning while promoting creativity, originality, and critical thinking.

Criteria and procedure for evaluation of the activity

Participation in at least 85% of the sessions and a final presentation of a practical case illustrating the ethical use of AI in the classroom.

Inscription