Session | Start date and time | End date and time | Aula | Location |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 10/11/2025 10:00 | 10/11/2025 13:00 | Aula 1.1 SFPIE | Lifelong Learning and Educational Innovation Service (SFPIE) |
2 | 13/11/2025 10:00 | 13/11/2025 13:00 | Aula 1.1 SFPIE | Lifelong Learning and Educational Innovation Service (SFPIE) |
3 | 20/11/2025 09:30 | 20/11/2025 13:30 | Aula 1.1 SFPIE | Lifelong Learning and Educational Innovation Service (SFPIE) |
Participants will be selected according to the following criteria: - For courses with specific requirements, applicants must be verified as meeting them. - Preference will be given to applicants who have not taken similar courses in the last three years. - Likewise, preference will be given to those who have not taken training courses in the last three years. - In the event of a tie between applicants based on the above criteria, applications must be submitted in strict order (date and time of submission).
- Gallent Torres, Cinta
- PDI-Ajudant Doctor/A
Objectives:
- Understand key concepts related to AI and its implications in educational contexts.
- Reflect critically on ethical dilemmas posed by AI use in the classroom, including issues such as AIgiarism, bias, and over-reliance.
- Design and adapt lesson plans that incorporate AI while preserving ethical and academic standards.
- Share and evaluate practical examples of AI integration through collaborative and peer-reviewed presentations.
- Promote a culture of responsible, reflective, and transparent AI use within the University of Valencia.
Session Contents and structure: Asynchronous Session (2 hours): Pre-course Reading: Participants will read selected articles and case studies on AI in higher education to get ready for the in-person sessions. September 23, 2025 — In-person Session (3 hours) 10:00 AM – 1:00 PM
|
|
September 25, 2025 — In-person Session (3 hours) 10:00 AM – 1:00 PM
October 3, 2025 — In-person Session (4 hours) 09:30 AM – 1:30 PM
Presentation of a Practical Case Using AI in the Classroom: Participants will present a creative activity they have implemented or plan to implement using AI, providing a clear overview of its objectives, methods, and expected outcomes. The presentation should also include a reflection on how the ethical use of AI is ensured, addressing potential risks such as AIgiarism, bias, and over-reliance on technology.
Duration: 8 minutes per presentation, followed by peer feedback. Each participant will be assigned a fellow faculty member as commentator to provide constructive feedback on their presentation, followed by a group reflection. A template will be provided to guide participants in constructively co-evaluating their colleagues’ work. This peer feedback, along with input from the facilitator, will help refine and improve their approach to integrating AI into teaching.
Methodology Hands-on Exploration: Participants will collaboratively explore their current knowledge of AI and share examples of how they are integrating AI tools into their teaching practice. Group Activity: Through case studies and discussions, participants will analyze ethical risks and practical scenarios involving AI misuse, with a particular focus on challenges like AIgiarism. Group Feedback: Participants will exchange insights and provide peer feedback to help each other refine their understanding and improve the ethical use of AI in education.
This activity is also part of the initiatives of Red-IA (https://red-ia.org/) and the IA-FIP Project (https://ia-fip.org/), funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER “A way of making Europe” (ref. PID2022-141031NB-I00), aimed at promoting Academic Integrity in Initial Teacher Education.
|
1 |
Understand the ethical frameworks and principles guiding responsible AI use in higher education, including fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy. |
2 |
Identify and critically assess risks and challenges related to the use of AI in the classroom, such as AIgiarism, bias, over-reliance on AI tools, and impacts on academic integrity. |
3 |
Apply ethical principles to real classroom contexts, designing or adapting lesson plans that integrate AI tools in a pedagogically sound and responsible way. |
4 |
Collaborate with peers to analyze scenarios and provide constructive feedback on the ethical and practical integration of AI in education. |
5 |
Reflect on their own teaching practices and how AI can be used to support student learning while promoting creativity, originality, and critical thinking. |
Participation in at least 85% of the sessions and a final presentation of a practical case illustrating the ethical use of AI in the classroom.