The UV research groups (GIUV) are regulated in the 1st chapter of the Regulation ACGUV48/2013, which explains the procedure for creating new research structures. They are basic research and organizational structures that result from the voluntary association of researchers that share objectives, facilities, resources and common lines of research. These researchers are also committed to the consolidation and stability of their activity, work in groups and the capability to achieve a sustainable funding.
The research groups included in the previously mentioned Regulation are registered in the Register of Research Structures of the Universitat de València (REIUV), managed by the Office of the Vice-principal for Research. The basic information of these organisms can be found in this website.
Participants
Data related to research groups featured in various information dissemination channels shall not, under any circumstances, imply a statement or commitment regarding the employment or academic affiliation of individuals associated with the Universitat de València. Their inclusion is solely the responsibility of the group directors. Updates will be made upon request from interested parties.
- Registered groups in the Register of Research Structures of the Universitat de València - (REIUV)
Reference of the Group:
Description of research activity: This is a research group working within the analytic tradition broadly conceived that is the product of the association of two Research Groups: Phronesis and Méthodos. Like other groups in Continental Europe, we focus on central issues in the philosophy of language, the philosophy of mind, the philosophy and methodology of science, logic, metaphysics and epistemology, but are also interested in ethics and aesthetics. One of our aims is to cultivate the kind of clear and rigorous research that is specific of analytic philosophy in fields traditionally reserved, in our institutional context, to continental approaches. We promote the interaction with other philosophers and groups within the analytic tradition.
Web:
Scientific-technical goals: - 1) To explore some central issues central issues in the philosophy of language, the philosophy of mind, the philosophy and methodology of science, logic, metaphysics and epistemology. / Investigar cuestiones centrales en filosofia del lenguaje, filosofia de la mente, filosofia y metodologia de la ciencia, logica, metafisica y epistemologia. / Investigar questions centrals en filosofia del llenguatge, filosofia de la ment, filosofia i metodologia de la ciencia, metafisica i epistemologia.
- 2) To investigate some issues in ethics and aesthetics. / Estudiar algunos problemas en el ambito de la etica y de la estetica. / Estudiar alguns problemes en l'ambit de l'etica i de l''estetica.
- 3) To cultivate the kind of clear and rigorous research typical of analytic philosophy in fields traditionally reserved, in our institutional context, to continental approaches. / Cultivar el tipo de investigacion clara y rigurosa propia de la filosofia analitica en ambitos habitualmente reservados, en nuestro contexto institucional, a la tradicion continental. / Conrear el tipus d'investigacio clara i rigorosa propia de la filosofia analitica en ambits habitualment reservats, en el nostre context institucional, a la tradicio continental.
Research lines: - Self-Knowledge, Moral Responsibility and Authenticity.The main goal in this line of research is to recover the connection between the debate about self-knowledge and the debate about the question "How should one live?" on the basis of Bernard Williams' concept of practical necessity and, for this purpose, we will explore some scientific experiments and classical literary texts.
- Eliminativism, fictionalism, expresivism, and the possibility of a negative metaphysical verdict..This line of research explores a series of discourses of special philosophical significance (such as the ones about states of affairs, material objects, mental and representational states, or evaluative judgments) in order to determine whether it is possible to coherently defend the view that the world as it is in itself, independently of us, does not contain the facts or properties presupposed in them. We focus, in particular, on the evaluation of three strategies that deny that the relevant discourses are true: eliminativism, fictionalism and expressivism.
- Intercultural Understanding, Belonging and Value: Wittgensteinian Approaches..The main goal of this line of research is to explore, from the perspective of Wittgensteinian philosophy, the question of what counts as intercultural understanding, by shedding light on the relation between its epistemic, ethical, anthropological and political aspects.
- Contemporary Science: its methodological and epistemological dimensions.In the last decades there has been a noticeable increase in the conceptual and methodological resources available to the scientist. Among those that are more widely applied it is worth mentioning the algorithms on model selection, Bayesian statistics, causal inference strategies from probabilities/frequencies, computer simulation, or the articulation of mechanistic models. The general aim of this line of research is to revisit the epistemological questions traditionally addressed by the philosophy of science (experimentation, confirmation, explanation, realism/anti-realism, objectivity & values) in the light of recent resources available to scientific practitioners.
Group members:
CNAE:
Associated structure:
Keywords: - Auto-conocimiento, Moralidad, Libertad, Responsabilidad, Autenticidad, Opacidad, Razones.
- metafísica, antirrealismo, eliminacionismo, ficcionalismo, expresivismo, estados de cosas, verdad, representación mental, primera persona, responsabilidad moral
- Intercultural, Interculturalidad, Compresión, Conocimiento, Injusticia Epistémica, Resistencia Epistémica, Epistemología, Ética, Filosofía Política, Religión, Diversidad.
- experimento, modelo, metodologia estadística, predicción, explicación, confirmación, realismo científico, causalidad
